It would be nice if the code could be enhanced so that the new
ASSET_USAGE_OUT_IN type and the old ASSET_USAGE are children of a common type,
e.g.:
ASSET
|___> ASSET_USAGE
|
|___> ASSET_USAGE_OUT_IN
and then, when specific behavior is required, the
EntityTypeUtil.
Thanks for the comment, fixed in revision 1176145
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:18 +0530, Deepak Dixit wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> inline:
>
> On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:10 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: hansbak
> > Date: Fri Sep 9 06:40:28 2011
> > New Revision: 1167015
> >
> > UR
Thanks Hans :)
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
On Sep 22, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> Thank you for the tip, we will have a look at it
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:18 +0530, Deepak Dixit wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> inline:
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:10 PM
Thank you for the tip, we will have a look at it
Regards,
Hans
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:18 +0530, Deepak Dixit wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> inline:
>
> On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:10 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: hansbak
> > Date: Fri Sep 9 06:40:28 2011
> > New Revision: 1167015
> >
>
Hi Hans,
inline:
On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:10 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: hansbak
> Date: Fri Sep 9 06:40:28 2011
> New Revision: 1167015
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1167015&view=rev
> Log:
> New product type: Fixed Asset Usage For Rental of an asset which is shipped
> f
H Adrian, i followed the product -> inventoryitem -> location pattern
which allows inventory management to reorganize inventory whithout
affecting either products or assets.
Linking directly to locations would mean massive changes to picking and
shipping. Now we can use existing functions.
Regards
I don't like this approach. Adding an inventory item for fixed assets
seems redundant - it would be better to just link the fixed asset to a
location. Also, I wonder how this affects accounting in the proposed
rental business. Will the fixed assets be calculated as inventory?
-Adrian
On 9/9/2
