Hello Taher,
Taher Alkhateeb writes:
> So just to make sure I understand this correctly, we're replacing the
> old synchronized block with a ConcurrentHashMap using the atomic
> function "computeIfAbsent" and then refactored the class loading logic
> into a separate method right?
That's correct
Le 27/05/2018 à 00:33, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
So just to make sure I understand this correctly, we're replacing the
old synchronized block with a ConcurrentHashMap using the atomic
function "computeIfAbsent" and then refactored the class loading logic
into a separate method right?
Yes, that's
So just to make sure I understand this correctly, we're replacing the
old synchronized block with a ConcurrentHashMap using the atomic
function "computeIfAbsent" and then refactored the class loading logic
into a separate method right?
Given how critical this piece of code is, wouldn't it be more
