[jira] [Commented] (ONAMI-97) Refactoring/generalization of Onami LifeCycle.

2013-03-09 Thread Simone Tripodi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13597894#comment-13597894 ] Simone Tripodi commented on ONAMI-97: - Sorry for the delay mate, I've been pretty busy a

Re: org.apache.onami in artifactIds

2013-03-09 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > Out of curiosity, why do the Onami artifacts have org.apache.onami in them? > Typically this is only in the groupId. No reference at the moment, but if you search the mailinglists: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-onami

Re: org.apache.onami in artifactIds

2013-03-09 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 9 Mar 2013, at 11:10, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Jordan Zimmerman > wrote: >> Out of curiosity, why do the Onami artifacts have org.apache.onami in them? >> Typically this is only in the groupId. > > No reference at the moment, but if you search the mailing

Re: org.apache.onami in artifactIds

2013-03-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
> Simone explained somewhere its necessary for some OSGi magic. Maybe > its a good thing to document as it the question comes up from time to > time. it is not _necessary_ mate, it is just to adhere to a widely adopted convention :) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.li

[jira] [Commented] (ONAMI-97) Refactoring/generalization of Onami LifeCycle.

2013-03-09 Thread Simone Tripodi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13597970#comment-13597970 ] Simone Tripodi commented on ONAMI-97: - Hi Jordan, I think you can go ahead, no more rea

[jira] [Resolved] (ONAMI-97) Refactoring/generalization of Onami LifeCycle.

2013-03-09 Thread Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jordan Zimmerman resolved ONAMI-97. --- Resolution: Fixed r1454749 r1454750 r1454751 r1454752 r1454753 I'll update the docs/site as so

Re: org.apache.onami in artifactIds

2013-03-09 Thread Jordan Zimmerman
Here's the relevant mail: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-onami-dev/201212.mbox/%3CCAAqLGLNmB+P9+MTWbt0dWw_dUscM+Uh==vk0ff7bwmtk+py...@mail.gmail.com%3E -JZ On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:10 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Jordan Zimmerman > wrote: >

Onami-Aggregator - Build # 97 - Still Failing

2013-03-09 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Onami-Aggregator (build #97) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Onami-Aggregator/97/ to view the results.

[jira] [Created] (ONAMI-100) Add Warm Up to Lifecycle

2013-03-09 Thread Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)
Jordan Zimmerman created ONAMI-100: -- Summary: Add Warm Up to Lifecycle Key: ONAMI-100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-100 Project: Apache Onami Issue Type: New Feature

Re: Onami-Aggregator - Build # 97 - Still Failing

2013-03-09 Thread Jordan Zimmerman
Everything compiles for me. I'm not sure why it's not picking up the changes to Scopes. Does the Jenkins build to a clean compile? -JZ On Mar 9, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > The Apache Jenkins build system has built Onami-Aggregator (build #97) > > Status: Still Failing

[jira] [Updated] (ONAMI-100) Add Warm Up to Lifecycle

2013-03-09 Thread Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jordan Zimmerman updated ONAMI-100: --- Description: Methods annotated with @WarmUp will be called in parallel (using the Java Fork-J

Onami-Aggregator - Build # 98 - Still Failing

2013-03-09 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Onami-Aggregator (build #98) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Onami-Aggregator/98/ to view the results.

Re: Onami-Aggregator - Build # 97 - Still Failing

2013-03-09 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > Everything compiles for me. I'm not sure why it's not picking up the changes > to Scopes. Does the Jenkins build to a clean compile? I can do mvn compile, but mvn test does not do the trick. So I think its an compilation error in testcase

Onami-Aggregator - Build # 99 - Still Failing

2013-03-09 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Onami-Aggregator (build #99) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Onami-Aggregator/99/ to view the results.

Re: Onami-Aggregator - Build # 97 - Still Failing

2013-03-09 Thread Jordan Zimmerman
Yeah - I'm seeing that too now. I don't understand why. Scope's pom has lifecycle.standard as a dep. org.apache.onami org.apache.onami.lifecycle.standard 0.2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT test -JZ On Mar 9, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Sat, Mar

Re: Onami-Aggregator - Build # 97 - Still Failing

2013-03-09 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Jordan, You come to a point where scope needs some tests class defined in lifecycle.standard. Maven does not generate the test-jar for you. We decided recently to not activate that generation for all modules: http://markmail.org/message/zp6vfz4u4bazbtgz To fix it, you need to add in life

[jira] [Commented] (ONAMI-97) Refactoring/generalization of Onami LifeCycle.

2013-03-09 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13598180#comment-13598180 ] Hudson commented on ONAMI-97: - Integrated in Onami-Lifecycle #121 (See [https://builds.apache.o

[jira] [Commented] (ONAMI-97) Refactoring/generalization of Onami LifeCycle.

2013-03-09 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ONAMI-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13598181#comment-13598181 ] Hudson commented on ONAMI-97: - Integrated in Onami-Scopes #9 (See [https://builds.apache.org/jo