ed:
>
> GenericFile (4) MP3 (4)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wei
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Barber [mailto:tom.bar...@meteorite.bi]
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 1:42 PM
> To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> Subject: Re: filemgr-client script cannot delete p
gt;> http://localhost:9000
> > >>
> > >> Both returned 4 back to me.
> > >>
> > >> It seems to reflect the numbers returned from OPS UI interface. I
> have
> > >>2
> > >> generic Files and 2 MP3 files, on screen it d
; >> It seems to reflect the numbers returned from OPS UI interface. I have
> >>2
> >> generic Files and 2 MP3 files, on screen it displayed:
> >>
> >> GenericFile (4) MP3 (4)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Wei
> >
that be caused by incorrect property settings?
>
> Wei
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Barber [mailto:magicaltr...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 7:42 PM
> To: Lewis John Mcgibbney
> Cc: dev@oodt.apache.org
> Subject: Re: filemgr-client sc
)
Could that be caused by incorrect property settings?
Wei
-Original Message-
From: Tom Barber [mailto:magicaltr...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 7:42 PM
To: Lewis John Mcgibbney
Cc: dev@oodt.apache.org
Subject: Re: filemgr-client script cannot delete product by id or name
pcFileManager.removeProduct(ja
>> va.util.Hashtable)
>>
>>
>> Could that be caused by incorrect property settings?
>>
>> Wei
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tom Barber [mailto:magicaltr...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February
ductTypeMethods:82 » RepositoryManager
> java.lan...
>
> Tests run: 213, Failures: 72, Errors: 9, Skipped: 0
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Barber [mailto:tom.bar...@meteorite.bi <javascript:;>]
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:49 AM
> To: dev@oodt.ap
can also run tests successfully?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tom Barber [mailto:tom.bar...@meteorite.bi <javascript:;>]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:24 AM
> > To: dev@oodt.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > Subject: RE: filemgr
Methods:119 » RepositoryManager
>> > java.lang.E...
>> > TestXmlRpcStructFactory.testProductTypeMethods:82 »
>> > RepositoryManager java.lan...
>> >
>> > Tests run: 213, Failures: 72, Errors: 9, Skipped: 0
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>
>> Could that be caused by incorrect property settings?
>>
>> Wei
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom Barber [mailto:magicaltr...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 7:42 PM
>> To: Lewis John Mcgibbney
>> Cc: dev@oodt.
om.bar...@meteorite.bi]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:49 AM
To: dev@oodt.apache.org
Subject: RE: filemgr-client script cannot delete product by id or name
The tests always used to fail for me because for some reason they only compiled
with the system clock not set to GMT! But I don't
cts.Product@1475d8e' :
> >> org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
> >> org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.system.XmlRpcFileManager.removeProduct(ja
> >> va.util.Hashtable)
> >>
> >>
> >> Could that be ca
-Original Message-
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney [mailto:lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:40 AM
> To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> Subject: Re: filemgr-client script cannot delete product by id or name
>
> Ok well this has to be environment specific. OODT test
.mcgibb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:40 AM
>> To: dev@oodt.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: filemgr-client script cannot delete product by id or
>> name
>>
>> Ok well this has to be environment specific. OODT tests have never
>>
rted oodt as a maven project
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney [mailto:lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:40 AM
> >> To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: filemg
Tom,
Is this issue not then one which was raised prior to the 0.11 release?
Lewis
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Shi, Wei wrote:
> Hi,
> I've setup an oodt test instance and followed "Solr File Manger Quick
> Start Guide" to deployed Solr.
>
> Now I can ingest files and
Thanks Tom.
@Wei,
I wonder if you can upgrade to OODT to 0.11 to try again?
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Tom Barber wrote:
> That is similar, but to me this looks like a jar file mismatch because
> that error is a missing method, but the method can't be missing,
That is similar, but to me this looks like a jar file mismatch because that
error is a missing method, but the method can't be missing, other wise it
surely wouldn't compile?
Tom
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tom,
> Is this issue not
18 matches
Mail list logo