[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1659) oozie-site is missing email-action-0.2 schema

2014-04-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13963850#comment-13963850 ] Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1659: -- Testing JIRA OOZIE-1659 Cleaning local git workspace

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-423) OOZIE-6: Oozie should reject coordinators with zero instances

2014-04-09 Thread Jaydeep Vishwakarma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13963890#comment-13963890 ] Jaydeep Vishwakarma commented on OOZIE-423: ---

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-709) There should be a way to kill individual coordinator actions.

2014-04-09 Thread Jaydeep Vishwakarma (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13963967#comment-13963967 ] Jaydeep Vishwakarma commented on OOZIE-709: --- I am interested to work on it.

[jira] [Reopened] (OOZIE-709) There should be a way to kill individual coordinator actions.

2014-04-09 Thread Rohini Palaniswamy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohini Palaniswamy reopened OOZIE-709: -- There should be a way to kill individual coordinator actions.

[jira] [Resolved] (OOZIE-709) There should be a way to kill individual coordinator actions.

2014-04-09 Thread Rohini Palaniswamy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohini Palaniswamy resolved OOZIE-709. -- Resolution: Duplicate There should be a way to kill individual coordinator actions.

[jira] [Resolved] (OOZIE-709) There should be a way to kill individual coordinator actions.

2014-04-09 Thread Rohini Palaniswamy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohini Palaniswamy resolved OOZIE-709. -- Resolution: Fixed This is actually already fixed in OOZIE-1476 in trunk. There should

[jira] [Resolved] (OOZIE-1628) Please delete old releases from mirroring system

2014-04-09 Thread Robert Kanter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Kanter resolved OOZIE-1628. -- Resolution: Fixed Please delete old releases from mirroring system

Is oozie trunk share lib behavior backward compatible?

2014-04-09 Thread Satish Mittal
Hi, I built oozie trunk and started oozie server with default config options. The oozie share lib directory is present in HDFS at usual location /user/oozie/share/lib. However oozie server logs contained: 2014-04-09 18:17:57,507 WARN main ConfigurationService - SERVER[dev1] USER[-] GROUP[-]

Re: Is oozie trunk share lib behavior backward compatible?

2014-04-09 Thread Purshotam Shah
Bowen is correct. You need to upload using oozie-setup.sh sharelib create to sharelib. It copies sharelib to a new timestamp directory. One can upload multiple version of sharelib. Server will cleanup the older sharelib. Earlier user have to clean it manually. If you donĀ¹t want to use

[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-1786) Update DG_QuickStart.html#Oozie_Share_Lib_Installation to use correct approach to upload sharelib

2014-04-09 Thread Purshotam Shah (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Purshotam Shah updated OOZIE-1786: -- Description: Doc DG_QuickStart.html#Oozie_Share_Lib_Installation still describe the older

[jira] [Reopened] (OOZIE-1628) Please delete old releases from mirroring system

2014-04-09 Thread Sebb (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb reopened OOZIE-1628: - What about 4.0.0? Is that a release that is still being maintained? Will there be any further releases after

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1638) Action retry does not use default retry max count.

2014-04-09 Thread Mona Chitnis (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13964719#comment-13964719 ] Mona Chitnis commented on OOZIE-1638: - I'm also divided on whats the correct default

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1785) Add oozie email action xsd to OozieCli.java

2014-04-09 Thread Jagat Singh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13964730#comment-13964730 ] Jagat Singh commented on OOZIE-1785: Hi, Can someone suggest what could be good way

[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-1659) oozie-site is missing email-action-0.2 schema

2014-04-09 Thread Jagat Singh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jagat Singh updated OOZIE-1659: --- Attachment: OOZIE-1659.2.patch oozie-site is missing email-action-0.2 schema

[jira] [Assigned] (OOZIE-1782) Workflow path not found is thrown as SC_UNAUTHORIZED

2014-04-09 Thread Purshotam Shah (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Purshotam Shah reassigned OOZIE-1782: - Assignee: Purshotam Shah Workflow path not found is thrown as SC_UNAUTHORIZED

[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-1659) oozie-site is missing email-action-0.2 schema

2014-04-09 Thread Jagat Singh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jagat Singh updated OOZIE-1659: --- Attachment: (was: OOZIE-1659-1.patch) oozie-site is missing email-action-0.2 schema

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1754) add order(sort) option and exclude filter for coord job Info

2014-04-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13964826#comment-13964826 ] Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1754: -- Testing JIRA OOZIE-1754 Cleaning local git workspace

Re: Review Request 18257: [OOZIE-1703] User should be able to set bundle/coord end-time before start time

2014-04-09 Thread Purshotam Shah
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18257/ --- (Updated April 9, 2014, 11:57 p.m.) Review request for oozie. Changes

[jira] [Created] (OOZIE-1787) parameterize interval of SLAService updating SlaStatus

2014-04-09 Thread Ryota Egashira (JIRA)
Ryota Egashira created OOZIE-1787: - Summary: parameterize interval of SLAService updating SlaStatus Key: OOZIE-1787 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1787 Project: Oozie Issue

[jira] [Created] (OOZIE-1788) add functionality to see dump of SlaMap

2014-04-09 Thread Ryota Egashira (JIRA)
Ryota Egashira created OOZIE-1788: - Summary: add functionality to see dump of SlaMap Key: OOZIE-1788 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1788 Project: Oozie Issue Type: Bug

Oozie-Hcat integration in secure cluster

2014-04-09 Thread bowen zhang
Hi all, I am wondering whether we have docs for oozie-hcat integration in secure mode. Because I assume we should need more configs for secure mode. Can anyone from yahoo comment on this? Bowen

[jira] Subscription: Oozie Patch Available

2014-04-09 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Oozie Patch Available (39 issues) Subscriber: ooziedaily Key Summary OOZIE-1785 Add oozie email action xsd to OozieCli.java https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1785 OOZIE-1782 Workflow path not found is thrown as SC_UNAUTHORIZED

Re: Oozie-Hcat integration in secure cluster

2014-04-09 Thread Mona Chitnis
Hello Bowen, 1) In the oozie action, you would need to add credentials tag with the following properties and specify type hcat. Then the HCatCredentialHelper class would be invoked for accessing tables through HCatalog. credential name='hcatauth' type='hcat' property

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1638) Action retry does not use default retry max count.

2014-04-09 Thread Azrael (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13964870#comment-13964870 ] Azrael commented on OOZIE-1638: --- ALL keyword for the retry error code is convenient to

[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-1653) Support ALL to allowed error code of the user retry

2014-04-09 Thread Azrael (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Azrael updated OOZIE-1653: -- Attachment: OOZIE-1653.2.patch Update rebased version. Support ALL to allowed error code of the user retry

Re: Review Request 18762: OOZIE-1709 CoordELFunctions.getCurrentInstance() is expensive

2014-04-09 Thread Purshotam Shah
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18762/#review39973 --- Went through one more time to patch.

Re: Oozie-Hcat integration in secure cluster

2014-04-09 Thread bowen zhang
Do you need to add cred into action in workflow.xml? Like, instead of having action name=pig-node, you need action name=pig-node cred=hcatauth bowen On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 6:13 PM, Mona Chitnis chit...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Hello Bowen, 1) In the oozie action, you would need to add

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1659) oozie-site is missing email-action-0.2 schema

2014-04-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13964905#comment-13964905 ] Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1659: -- Testing JIRA OOZIE-1659 Cleaning local git workspace

[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-1782) Workflow path not found is thrown as SC_UNAUTHORIZED

2014-04-09 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13964948#comment-13964948 ] Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1782: -- Testing JIRA OOZIE-1782 Cleaning local git workspace

Re: Is oozie trunk share lib behavior backward compatible?

2014-04-09 Thread bowen zhang
I think Satish raises a very good point. I have been long uncomfortable with the sharelib change that breaks backward compatibility. This is not really a minor incompatibility, potentially, this is a product busting incompatibility since no one can run any actions if directly upgrading from 4.0