Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Andras, Satish many thanks for the reviews. I will create a new release candidate once OOZIE-3152 has been fixed. On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Satish Saley wrote: > I have made OOZIE-3152 as blocker since Oozie version should be viewable > on UI. > > Rest of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

I have made OOZIE-3152 as blocker since Oozie version should be viewable on UI. Rest of the things I checked : - Verified md5 - Built Oozie - Ran job on hadoop 2.8.1 and checked the graph On Wednesday, January 3, 2018, 1:15:52 PM PST, Attila Sasvari < asasv...@cloudera.com> wrote: Many thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Hi Attila, compiled against Hadoop 2.6.5 and tested locally on a pseudo-distributed cluster all the examples and all passing except for Pig, Spark, Sqoop, and Hive related ones - all for reasons outside Oozie. Green light from my side as well. *+1 (non-binding).* Regards, Andras On Wed, Jan

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Many thanks Robert for highlighting those changes, reviewing Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 release candidate 0 and filing follow-up JIRAs. I totally agree that OOZIE-2814 and OOZIE-3150 are blockers. Please let me know if you run into any other issues. /* The vote is open until Thursday, January 04, 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Thanks for putting this together. Another important thing to note in the highlights that as part of moving the launcher, we also dropped support for Hadoop 1.x and we added new 1.0 schemas. +1 Here's what I did: - Verified md5 - Verified signature (gpg) - Built Oozie against Hadoop 2.7.2 - Ran

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Hi Attila! It looks like I've messed up the extraction of the tar.gz and I was looking at empty folders :) Will validate the release tomorrow. Sorry for causing confusion! gp On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Attila Sasvari wrote: > @Andras: many thanks. Please let me

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

@Andras: many thanks. Please let me know if you notice anything strange with hashes or run into other problems. @gp: thanks a lot. This is actually what the bin/create-release-artifact script has generated. Comparing it with previous release candidate (4.3.0 rc1), file size of

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Thanks Attila! The tar.gz does not contain the release, it only contains the pom files. The whole thing is 2.4 Mb, an Oozie was bigger the last time I've checked :) gp On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Attila Sasvári wrote: > Hi there, > > I have created a build for Oozie

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Thanks Attila, will download and test the RC till then. Regards, Andras Attila Sasvári (időpont: 2017. dec. 28., Cs, 0:53) ezt írta: > Hi there, > > I have created a build for Oozie 5.0.0-beta1, release candidate 0. > > This release introduces major changes: > - moving

Re: [VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Yaaay :) Kiraly!!! Andris Ps.: MapReduce mapper to YARN AM sztem Attila Sasvári (időpont: 2017. dec. 28., Cs, 0:53) ezt írta: > Hi there, > > I have created a build for Oozie 5.0.0-beta1, release candidate 0. > > This release introduces major changes: > - moving launcher

[VOTE] Release Oozie 5.0.0-beta1 (candidate 0)

Hi there, I have created a build for Oozie 5.0.0-beta1, release candidate 0. This release introduces major changes: - moving launcher from MapReduce AM to Oozie AM, - switching from Tomcat to embedded Jetty, - completely rewritten graph generator, - local sharelib, - JDK 8 support. Keys to