Re: Is it time for 3.0.1 release?

2019-03-25 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, it seems we are quite stuck in this pre-release process, let's try to finalize the great work carried out lately. By looking at JIRA [1], OpenJPA 3.0.1 (or 3.1.0? it seems to me there was enough consensus around that), has 29 issues done and 15 to do, e.g. [2]. From there, I would

[jira] [Resolved] (OPENJPA-2710) Create and update to geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec

2019-03-25 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Francesco Chicchiriccò resolved OPENJPA-2710. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Mark Struberg Done in OPENJPA-2747

Re: Is it time for 3.0.1 release?

2019-03-25 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
I would say OPENJPA-2754 can be closed as Resolved-Fixed -- Any objections? My opinion 3.0.1/3.1.0 in current state is step forward comparing to 3.0.0 I would say: let's release :) On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 21:22, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: > > Hi all, > it seems we are quite stuck in this

[jira] [Commented] (OPENJPA-2781) OpenJPA need internet connection to read the persistence.xml

2019-03-25 Thread Rafael Macedo (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16800643#comment-16800643 ] Rafael Macedo commented on OPENJPA-2781: I'll test it soon, but in advance I thank you very