[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12681724#action_12681724
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-609:
---
folks, what part is still missing?
Can we
tests rely on US date formatting without setting the correct Locale
---
Key: OPENJPA-1383
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1383
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12777996#action_12777996
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1383:
retested - works now, txs!
tests rely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797074#action_12797074
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1384:
it seems like this patch got applied (at
InstrumentationFactory crashes the tomcat WebappClassLoader by injecting
org.apache.openjpa classes into the SystemClassLoader
--
Key: OPENJPA-1454
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797281#action_12797281
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1454:
yes, I disabled the whole agent for now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797296#action_12797296
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1454:
yes and no ;)
I inject the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797302#action_12797302
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1454:
yes, I use the openjpa-maven-plugin to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797348#action_12797348
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1454:
Oki, the whole story:
I used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797350#action_12797350
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1454:
@Rick here is an example stacktrace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1387:
---
Attachment: openjpa-test.zip
it seems that this bug is still not fixed (tested with latest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12864365#action_12864365
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1387:
A few tips on my sample project:
The NOT
the prepared query cache doesn't currently work correclty with 'SELECT IN'
statements
-
Key: OPENJPA-1845
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1845
EntityManager#merge sometimes passes wrong entity values to @PostLoad
EntityListeners
--
Key: OPENJPA-1873
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1873:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1873-unittest.patch
this unit test shows the problem. If you comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929819#action_12929819
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1873:
Rick, the merge acutally does much more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930105#action_12930105
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1873:
I did further debugging.
In the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930126#action_12930126
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1873:
but it seems that EclipseLink and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930126#action_12930126
]
Mark Struberg edited comment on OPENJPA-1873 at 11/9/10 9:15 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1873:
---
Attachment: postloadtest.zip
Hi! Just verified that @PostLoad gets fired in Hibernate. See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12931463#action_12931463
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1873:
Do we have someone representing the ASF
TestQueryMultiThreaded fails with OOME unable to create new native thread
---
Key: OPENJPA-1898
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1898
Project: OpenJPA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1898:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1898.patch
reduce parallel threads from 1000 to 800. Now it's not very
ClassCastException when serializing an entity if DetachedStateField=true
Key: OPENJPA-1900
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1900
Project: OpenJPA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12965662#action_12965662
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1900:
I was still not able to reproduce this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1900:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1900-test-1.patch
I tried to reproduce my problem with an unit test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966085#action_12966085
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1900:
actually it was my error, forgot to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966249#action_12966249
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1900:
think I know the difference between the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12966269#action_12966269
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1900:
The Externalizable field gets added if I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1900:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1900-fix.patch
this small patch fixes the behaviour. This needs a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12972130#action_12972130
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1900:
Hi Rick! I'm currently compiling, so
enhance unit tests with the correct persistence.xml
---
Key: OPENJPA-1909
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1909
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: build /
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1909:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1909.patch
enhance unit tests with the correct persistence.xml
enhancer generates invalid code if fetch-groups is activated
Key: OPENJPA-1912
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12976914#action_12976914
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
my naive question first: why do we need
If fetch-groups is used, detaching an entity will lead to all lazy loaded
members get reset to null
---
Key: OPENJPA-1913
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1913:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1913-test.patch
Patch against the current trunk to demonstrate the
missing license header
--
Key: OPENJPA-1915
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1915
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2.0
Reporter: Mark Struberg
Fix For:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1915:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1915.patch
patch for adding the license headers
missing license
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1913:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1913-enhancer-fix.patch
this small patch fixes a few errors I had in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977433#action_12977433
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1916:
Yes, I tried to resume the build from an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1916:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
set to 'minor'. I didn't close it because tests should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978405#action_12978405
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1913:
hmm, interesting point. But of course,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978771#action_12978771
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1873:
Hi!
This is just a small summary about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978824#action_12978824
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1909:
it's not needed, should get moved to an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1873:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1873-fix1.patch
Hi Rick!
Here is my first take on the problem based
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979044#action_12979044
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1873:
one thing: we should possibly suppress
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1873:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1873-fix2.patch
and here comes the next one, this time with a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12985642#action_12985642
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
It seems this has nothing to do with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1912:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1912-test.patch
This unit test demontstrates the problem. I get the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986662#action_12986662
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
oki, starting with that stuff now.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986775#action_12986775
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
nah, I already fixed bytecode issues in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986796#action_12986796
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
got it roughly working, but I'm not sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1912:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1912-fix-wo_cleanup.patch
Hi!
This patch fixes the issue but still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12986998#action_12986998
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
figured that I still have a few bugs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1912:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1912-fix-wo_cleanup-2.patch
this patch now de-externalises in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1912:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1912-enhancer.patch
oops, I forgot to also attach the enhancer parts
@ElementCollection loose proxytype after serialisation
--
Key: OPENJPA-1933
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12989246#comment-12989246
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1933:
This might be a regression of
contribute an openjpa-maven-plugin
---
Key: OPENJPA-1934
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1934
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: tooling
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1933:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1933-test.patch
this patch extends a previous test which shows the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12989451#comment-12989451
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1933:
work in progress. probably only a unit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12989450#comment-12989450
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1933:
work in progress, maybe only a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990066#comment-12990066
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1934:
for the new place, I'd suggest to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1934:
---
Attachment: openjpa-tools.tar.gz
please find attached the first version of the Apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12991027#comment-12991027
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1095:
I know such problems too. If you use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1933:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-1933-test-2.patch
This test shows the problems. After the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992138#comment-12992138
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1933:
puh, pretty hard to reproduce in our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1933:
---
Attachment: openjpa-reg-tests.tar.gz
this needs the openjpa-tools being activated first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-1934:
---
Attachment: openjpa-tools-2.tar.gz
updated version which now
* doesn't need a MySQL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992146#comment-12992146
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
Rick, Mike, did you find a chance to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992348#comment-12992348
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
Txs Mike!
I'll try to apply it and run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992405#comment-12992405
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
patch looks fine so far but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992441#comment-12992441
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
omg, pretty heavy to find this issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992441#comment-12992441
]
Mark Struberg edited comment on OPENJPA-1912 at 2/9/11 12:11 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992453#comment-12992453
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1933:
omg, pretty heavy to find this issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992462#comment-12992462
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
I found a (pretty uncommon but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12992546#comment-12992546
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1912:
If OPENJPA-1707 is already implemented
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12995938#comment-12995938
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1942:
Jeremy, please consider that changing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12996275#comment-12996275
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1934:
Hi!
The site contains usage examples
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13003861#comment-13003861
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1792:
+1 for dropping the java5 support in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13009804#comment-13009804
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1916:
yes, guess it's ok to close it, got no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13015970#comment-13015970
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1651:
Rade, could you please also run your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13016305#comment-13016305
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-1934:
hi! Sure, just drop the @author tags.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13258830#comment-13258830
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2139:
Hi Heath!
Txs for doing a review and
Mark Struberg created OPENJPA-2178:
--
Summary: PostgresDictionary
Key: OPENJPA-2178
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2178
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13262647#comment-13262647
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2178:
postgresql-6.3 was in 1998 I honestly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg resolved OPENJPA-2178.
Resolution: Fixed
PostgresDictionary
---
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13262681#comment-13262681
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2141:
Actually I found a bug which could be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13262737#comment-13262737
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2141:
txs, I'll create a new issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13262746#comment-13262746
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2141:
I've now created OPENJPA-2179 for this.
Mark Struberg created OPENJPA-2179:
--
Summary: 'distinct' and 'join' combinations lead lots of
unneccessary sub-queries for @Embedded and @Lob fields
Key: OPENJPA-2179
URL:
Mark Struberg created OPENJPA-2180:
--
Summary: OpenJPA build broken in java7 / jdk-1.7
Key: OPENJPA-2180
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2180
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264283#comment-13264283
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2179:
I'm close to a working unit test now.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264285#comment-13264285
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2179:
Btw, I preserved an old output of this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264596#comment-13264596
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2179:
I have a pretty hard time reproducing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Struberg updated OPENJPA-2179:
---
Attachment: OPENJPA-2179-test-1.patch
The attached patch is a first version which doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264622#comment-13264622
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2179:
could this have something to do with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264718#comment-13264718
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2179:
I've now committed a unit test which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264937#comment-13264937
]
Mark Struberg commented on OPENJPA-2179:
If I change the fields inside the
1 - 100 of 611 matches
Mail list logo
