Thanks a lot!
merged :)
Committed revision 1742918.
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Peter Dähn wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> sorry for the late response. I was out of office unexpectedly.
>
> I had a look and translated as much as seems to be useful.
>
> Greetings Peter
>
> Am
Alright that makes sense. I think ioggstream, the Project Maintainer would
be fine with merging, as long as we get a version after migration which
works with very few bugs.
I like the steps you've mentioned and thus should hopefully get working on
that. This plan is sound and I hope to emulate
Well, the goal should be more that we bring the caldav4j changes you do in
a state where it is worth considering by the main developers to merge to
the master branch.
We cannot really integrate a library from your branch. We can integrate it
temporarily, for the duration of your GSoC project.
But