Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

Yeah, I downloaded previous version on the site yesterday, but we have enough time to make some changes. I updated the proposal: https://dropmefiles.com/MUggI On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:20 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com < seba.wag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah it's already submitted. I will apply to

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

Ah it's already submitted. I will apply to mentor. We now need to wait how Google and ASF will evaluate it. 2016-03-25 10:14 GMT+13:00 seba.wag...@gmail.com : > Hi Dmitriy, > > looks all good. I think it's an interesting proposal and you seem to be on > a good way to

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

Hi Dmitriy, looks all good. I think it's an interesting proposal and you seem to be on a good way to achieve it. Ready to submit IMHO. Thanks, Sebastian 2016-03-25 8:51 GMT+13:00 : > If you have added the points I think it's ready to submit to the GSoc > website. > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

If you have added the points I think it's ready to submit to the GSoc website. Sent from my iPhone > On 24/03/2016, at 9:16 PM, Dmitriy - wrote: > > Hello all, my proposal is here https://dropmefiles.com/c4rK2 > Fixes: > - Expand tasks in timeline > - Review timeline and

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

I'll try to answer in-line as best as possible. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:29 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello Paul, > > I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :)) > > "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares > video between clients?" > > A

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

@Dmitriy: Also one more note: Your timeline is a bit off. Your timeline end by end of July. But that is only the mid-term evaluation. Not finish of the project. However the program ends end of August. You are expected to still work and clean up your code till 23/08. I would then have time till

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

Hello Paul, I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :)) "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video between clients?" I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and OpenMeetings :) On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy -

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

Hello Paul, we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in our list, are you interested in participating in discussion? currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2] I believe you might ne interested in [1] :) [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk [2]

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

into the program of a few months of work. And it will need a defined scope/requirement and success criteria. What is your exact proposal ? Thanks, Sebastian 2016-03-10 19:40 GMT+13:00 Dmitry Bezheckov <dima00...@gmail.com>: Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION

Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

I think it's a good idea to continue gsoc2015 direction for OM. First of all we can change OM architecture from central server to p2p and then use new protocols like QUIC or SCTP. Using this we also save our ability save video on central server. Central server will not only link clients, but also

[DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas

Hello All, GSOC 2016 is coming :) In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas for our project I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional ideas in this thread Looking forward for you comments :) [1]