Re: svn commit: r1536630 - /opennlp/trunk/opennlp-tools/pom.xml

2013-10-29 Thread Jörn Kottmann
On 10/29/2013 11:11 AM, Mark G wrote: OK, I committed the POM only just to see if the CI server has Java 7 in it's path. Since we haven't gotten a build error yet, it may be fine. Haven't tried committing any code with J7 objects. I updated the configuration on the build server is now to Java

Re: svn commit: r1536630 - /opennlp/trunk/opennlp-tools/pom.xml

2013-10-29 Thread Mark G
Ok, thanks! I didn't know which server was the build server... same as SVN? I will try to commit some java 7 code now MG On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Jörn Kottmann kottm...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/29/2013 11:11 AM, Mark G wrote: OK, I committed the POM only just to see if the CI server

Build failed in Jenkins: OpenNLP » Apache OpenNLP Tools #445

2013-10-29 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP/org.apache.opennlp$opennlp-tools/445/changes Changes: [markg] OPENNLP-611 GeoHashBinScorer has java 1.7 dependant objects. [markg] OPENNLP-611 Commiting POM with 1.7 build tags. -- Oct 29, 2013 10:57:58 AM

Build failed in Jenkins: OpenNLP #445

2013-10-29 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP/445/changes Changes: [markg] OPENNLP-611 GeoHashBinScorer has java 1.7 dependant objects. [markg] OPENNLP-611 POM with 1.7 build tags. [markg] OPENNLP-611 POM with 1.7 build tags. [markg] OPENNLP-611 Commiting POM with 1.7 build tags.

Jenkins build is back to normal : OpenNLP » Apache OpenNLP Tools #446

2013-10-29 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP/org.apache.opennlp$opennlp-tools/446/changes

Jenkins build is back to normal : OpenNLP #446

2013-10-29 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP/446/changes

Re: svn commit: r1536630 - /opennlp/trunk/opennlp-tools/pom.xml

2013-10-29 Thread Lance Norskog
Will this screw up a project that uses OpenNLP jar if the project is still on Java 6? Lance On 10/29/2013 03:29 AM, Mark G wrote: Ok, thanks! I didn't know which server was the build server... same as SVN? I will try to commit some java 7 code now MG On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Jörn

Re: request for Input or ideas.... EntityLinker tickets

2013-10-29 Thread Lance Norskog
This is what memory-mapped file indexes are for! RAMDirectory is for very small projects. On 10/29/2013 04:00 AM, Mark G wrote: FYI, I implemented an in mem lucene index of the NGA Geonames. It was almost 7 GB ram and took about 40 minutes to load. Still looking at other DBs/Indexes. So one

Re: request for Input or ideas.... EntityLinker tickets

2013-10-29 Thread Mark G
thanks, that was my next option with lucene. Build the indexes from the gaz files and keep them up to date in one place, and make sure something like puppet will distribute them to each node in a cluster on some interval, then each task (map reduce or whatever) can use that file resource. I'll let