In my opinion the long term goal should be to work on training new, Apache2
licensed, ones and make them available to our users; it probably make sense
to take the SF models offline in any case because as long as they are there
people will keep downloading and using them, as that's just much
In my opinion the models should be documented. In some cases it is said the
training corpus used but in others it's not. We should also said which
features were used and the results obtained on which dataset. If default
features are used we should also said so.
If we cannot provide such info we
See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP_java8/1/
--
[...truncated 2518 lines...]
AU
opennlp-tools/src/main/java/opennlp/tools/formats/brat/RelationAnnotation.java
AU
See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP_java8/2/
Hello,
I added an OpenNLP Java 8 build to the build server.
This will hopefully inform us about problems with Java 8 in the future.
Jörn
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 20:25 +, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenNLP_java8/2/
