Re: OpenNLP Spanish models

Sorry, The tokenizer model is not there. Have you can training a Spanish tokenizer using the universal dependency data? Daniel > On Sep 13, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Dan Russ wrote: > > Hello, >Have you tried the old 1.5 source forge models available at > http://opennlp.sourcef

Re: OpenNLP Spanish models

Hello, Have you tried the old 1.5 source forge models available at http://opennlp.sourceforge.net/models-1.5/ ? The Spanish models start with es-. Daniel > On Sep 13, 2018, at 5:03 AM, Elsa Cerezo Fernández > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I

Re: NER Features

Damiano, You are treading in some dangerous waters. You need to open up the black box of the model and peek inside. I open up the NER model and get the maxent model inside. I make the context using the feature generator, then I get the context map inside the maxent model to lookup the

Re: Model file

Have you looked at either the GISBinaryModelWriter or Reader? It’s fairly simple, something like For models trained with the GISTrainer… GIS # of outcomes # of predictors Predictor-1 # of outcomes for this predictor; outcome-1-id,weight;outcome-2,weight;…outcome-n,weight; Predictor-2 # of

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.4 Release Candidate

[ X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.4 > On Dec 21, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Jeff Zemerick wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I have posted a first release candidate for the Apache OpenNLP 1.8.4 > release and it is ready for testing. > > The RC1 distributables can be

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.3 Release Candidate

+1 burrito ran units test on my downstream code that uses opennlp-tools. > On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:58 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > > +1 binding > > 1. Verified Sigs and hashes > 2. Ran a clean build from {src} * {zip, tar} > 3. All unit tests pass > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at

Re: Early stopping NameFinderME

Hi Jörn, I don’t see a problem with it. Make sure the default is set to the current value. Are you making the fix? I could get to it later tonight. Daniel > On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Joern Kottmann wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > do you see any issue if we expose

Re: Early stopping NameFinderME

can't you set the number of iterations in the training properties On Aug 24, 2017 4:48 AM, "Joern Kottmann" wrote: > You are the first one who ever asked this question. I think we have this as > an option already on the gis trainer but it is not exposed all the way >

Re: Parser vs Chunker

Hello Manoj, This is more a job for Wikipedia than opennlp’s dev mail list. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shallow_parsing Essentially, the term “parsing” is a

Re: Request for DEV Mailing List.

Hi Chaitanya, Go to http://opennlp.apache.org/mailing-lists.html it has instructions on how to sign up for the dev and user mail lists. Daniel On Jul 22, 2017 11:55 AM, "Chaitanya Karmarkar" < chaitanya.karmarkar...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, To whom it may concern. I would like to keep myself

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.1 Release Candidate 3

+1 binding > On Jul 7, 2017, at 1:26 PM, Jeff Zemerick wrote: > > +1 non-binding > > Builds and tests > High mem tests pass > Eval tests pass > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> >>>

Re: [GitHub] opennlp pull request #238: Revert merging of sentiment work, no consent to m...

Hi All, First, let me take a share of blame for the comment Chris mentioned. I believe I said something like the pull request was X revision behind and Y revisions ahead. It was not meant to be rude, it was meant to say it is hard to review code when it is so different from the current

Re: [VOTE] Migrate our main repositories to GitHub

+1 > On Jun 27, 2017, at 9:28 AM, William Colen wrote: > > +1 > > > 2017-06-27 9:35 GMT-03:00 Suneel Marthi : > >> +1 >> >> मेरे iPhone से प्रेषित >> >> २७/०६/२०१७ को पू ८:२२ पर Jeff Zemerick ने लिखा : >> >>> +1 >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenNLP 1.8.0 Release Candidate 3

My (not so thorough, but probably different than yours) tests passed. I vote: +1 On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Jeff Zemerick wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Built and tested a token name finder model on Ubuntu 16.04 and Amazon > Linux 2017.03.0 > with OpenJDK8. > > > On