I did not know that about StringTableSize. I thought it was more of a hard
limit. That's good to know. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Joern Kottmann wrote:
> The StringTableSize doesn't limit the amount of Strings that can be stored
> in the pool, if the size is too
The StringTableSize doesn't limit the amount of Strings that can be stored
in the pool, if the size is too small it just gets slower.
This would only be done for loading models, querying the model wouldn't be
affected. The predicate / feature strings would be interned.
Jörn
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017
Would it be possible to have an option or setting somewhere that determines
if string pooling is used? The option would provide backward compatibility
in case someone has to adjust the -XX:StringTableSize because their
existing models exceed the default JVM limit, and an option would also be