Since the OSX windows restore problem is very popular in our forums,
our mailing lists and in bugzilla I'd like to advertise my fix for that
(rev 1571205) and invite testers. A build of the latest trunk with the
fix is available at [1].
[1] http://people.apache.org/~hdu/AOO_Mac64_Test.dmg
Hi,
On 23.02.2014 15:10, LOH KOK HOE wrote:
As I read the partial build guideline, I'm a bit confuse on the build
step. When I done my changes on the sw module, can I specifically just
building the sw module only. I see there is a Makefile under the sw
module, can I just issue `make` command
On 2/14/14 12:44 PM, Riccardo Arzenton wrote:
Hi to all,
there's a way to package an oxt with a python macro and also put some python
library file in the program/python-core-2.7.5/Lib and Scripts Dir?
Cause my python macro use some library that i need to import and are not
default library
AFC e.tere@ srl wrote:
Did I do everything is required?
Should I have to resubmit the corrected version of XML (note in bullet 1)
Changes are OK for me. No need to resubmit the XML, we can simply change
Open Office - Apache Open Office when we publish it.
Regards,
Andrea.
On 2/18/14 9:27 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 17.02.2014 12:42, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 17.02.2014 12:05, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 17.02.2014 11:10, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 17.02.2014 09:33, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
good catch.
One minor remark:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Can we agree that we will answer all those mails by simply sending a link
to
a webpage or wiki page?
When I respond I just sent them to this
hallo! i've seen and downloaded the new 4 version...great and thanx 4 this! one
my question is: is that possibile in the future that can handle the microsoft
works extension (wks, etc..) ? can be useful to sobstitute totally the
microsoft programs i usethanx 4 the reply! Leo.
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 05:21:20 -0800 (PST)
Kobra kobr...@yahoo.com wrote:
hallo! i've seen and downloaded the new 4 version...great and thanx 4 this!
one my question is: is that possibile in the future that can handle the
microsoft works extension (wks, etc..) ? can be useful to sobstitute
Sorry for my late reply, tested OK. Great job.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.orgwrote:
On 22/02/2014 LOH KOK HOE wrote:
@pescetti,
I notice that the revision number of the fixed you sent to me is rather
old because when I issue the command `svn info |
If I have rebuild the sw module, done with no error. How could I launch the
Writer executable? BTW, I found the swriter under the `main/solver/410/
unxlngx6.pro/bin` directory, but it is not executable? How could I test my
work done on sw?
Hi,
On 24.02.2014 15:31, LOH KOK HOE wrote:
If I have rebuild the sw module, done with no error. How could I launch
the Writer executable? BTW, I found the swriter under the
`main/solver/410/unxlngx6.pro/bin` http://unxlngx6.pro/bin` directory,
but it is not executable? How could I test my work
On 2/19/14 4:18 AM, Samer Mansour wrote:
Good eye on the green, that was a mistake, correcting now and uploading a
new copy shortly.
Yeah @2 for their retina display basically twice the physical pixels per
inch (not sure if that statement is true, but its how we figure out the
icons.)
I
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:29:44 +0100
Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-02-12 19:48 GMT+01:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org:
Donald Whytock wrote:
http://openoffice.org should NOT redirect to anything. Please let us
know
if this did happen.
On 02/24/2014 07:01 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 24.02.2014 15:31, LOH KOK HOE wrote:
If I have rebuild the sw module, done with no error. How could I launch
the Writer executable? BTW, I found the swriter under the
`main/solver/410/unxlngx6.pro/bin` http://unxlngx6.pro/bin`
On 02/24/2014 07:32 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 2/19/14 4:18 AM, Samer Mansour wrote:
Good eye on the green, that was a mistake, correcting now and uploading a
new copy shortly.
Yeah @2 for their retina display basically twice the physical pixels per
inch (not sure if that statement is
15 matches
Mail list logo