+1
--
gw
2014-08-03 1:47 GMT+02:00 Andrew Douglas Pitonyak :
>
> I am often required to read and write DOCX files and I know others for
> which this is a need. If I cannot accurately read / write DOCX files (or if
> I suspect that it may not work correctly) then I use Word; I don't like it
> wh
I am often required to read and write DOCX files and I know others for
which this is a need. If I cannot accurately read / write DOCX files (or
if I suspect that it may not work correctly) then I use Word; I don't
like it when I have to use Word.
On 08/02/2014 10:24 AM, Alexandro Colorado wr
Below, Jan asks
"Does the standard contain some rules about keeping private information ?"
There are two cases for ODF 1.2.
First there is the case for foreign elements/attributes/attribute values. This
would be the case for some sort of extended material incorporated in the ODF
document.
In line with the sketch that Peter Kelley provides below, I am personally very
sympathetic to the idea of having an internal model that can tolerate
difference in format between input and output while preserving in the output
everything from the input format it can, even by leaving markers that
On 2 August 2014 20:27, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> s below.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 08:57
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: OOXML
>
> On 2 August 2014 17:06, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> >
> > > On 2014-08-02, at 10:24, Al
s below.
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 08:57
To: dev
Subject: Re: OOXML
On 2 August 2014 17:06, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> > On 2014-08-02, at 10:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >
> > The Support that is done is to receieve
On 2 Aug 2014, at 9:24 pm, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
> discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
>
> I still dont see a point to generate OOXML and most people dont care
> as long as they can se
On 2 August 2014 17:06, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> > On 2014-08-02, at 10:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >
> > The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
> > discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
> >
> > I still dont see a point to
> On 2014-08-02, at 10:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
> discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
>
> I still dont see a point to generate OOXML and most people dont care
> as long as they can
The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
I still dont see a point to generate OOXML and most people dont care
as long as they can send in office native formats.
I never heard someone saying, pleas
Fwd from the marketing list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alexandro Colorado
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 22:03:24 -0500
Subject: Funds for speaker to Central America Free Software event
To: market...@openoffice.apache.org
Hello, the ECSL (Central American Free Software Summit) send m
On 1 Aug 2014, at 2:42 pm, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> For information:
> http://www.themukt.com/2014/07/31/never-use-microsofts-ooxml-format/
An interesting article. This brings to mind a few issues I've been thinking
about for a while:
- I think the rather extreme anti-OOXML stance that some tak
12 matches
Mail list logo
