Re: Reporting broken download link

2014-12-18 Thread shawphilip7
Marcus I do not understand your reply. Philip Shaw Sent from my iPad On 17 Dec 2014, at 20:09, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 12/17/2014 09:08 AM, schrieb Phil Shaw: Dear Sirs I have been unable to install the download 4.1.1 version of Open Office. Below is screen dump which

Re: CentOS build box.

2014-12-18 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Kay Schenk wrote: I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver 5? It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part of our commitment to users. The baseline can change (we did it for Mac), but if there are no strong technical reasons for doing it is should

Re: Java 32

2014-12-18 Thread Carl Marcum
On 12/14/2014 05:46 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org wrote: On 12/12/2014 06:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 12/11/2014 12:37 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 12/11/2014 04:58 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: +1 to Andreas. Sounds like a plan. There

Re: [DISCUSS] No Suitable JRE Message

2014-12-18 Thread Carl Marcum
On 12/17/2014 09:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE). A suitable JRE is unavailable. For details http://openoffice.org/java.html; I am proposing this to avoid the various cases that arise, not just the 32-bit on x64 Windows case.

Re: Java 32

2014-12-18 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org wrote: On 12/14/2014 05:46 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org wrote: On 12/12/2014 06:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 12/11/2014 12:37 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 12/11/2014 04:58

Re: CentOS build box.

2014-12-18 Thread Kay Schenk
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Kay Schenk wrote: I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver 5? It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part of our commitment to users. The baseline can change (we did it

Re: CentOS build box.

2014-12-18 Thread jan i
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: Kay Schenk wrote: I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver 5? It is our baseline (our

Re: CentOS build box.

2014-12-18 Thread Michal Hriň
Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:20 jan i napísal(a): On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: Kay Schenk wrote: I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to

Re: CentOS build box.

2014-12-18 Thread Michal Hriň
Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:46 Michal Hriň napísal(a): Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:20 jan i napísal(a): On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: Kay Schenk wrote: I would really

Re: Your stand proposal for Apache OpenOffice has been accepted

2014-12-18 Thread jan i
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote: Hello, we, Mechtilde and me, hope to see you at FOSDEM 2015. I will be there, with apache stickers and a big smile. rgds jan i Kind regards Michael Original Message Subject: Your stand

Possible broken link: Checksums

2014-12-18 Thread Arthur Gilman
In downloading only step one came up and after clicking on that, No step 2 - Nothing!

Re: CentOS build box.

2014-12-18 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Michal Hriň wrote: On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote: My main concern at this point is the availability of security updates for this environment. I will be following up on a different thread about this. ... http://wiki.centos.org/Download No need for a different thread,

Re: Possible broken link: Checksums

2014-12-18 Thread Marcus
Am 12/18/2014 09:34 PM, schrieb Arthur Gilman: In downloading only step one came up and after clicking on that, No step 2 - Nothing! Please explain in more details what you have down and where and what was expected. At the moment I don't know what you mean. Thanks Marcus

Re: Reporting broken download link

2014-12-18 Thread Marcus
Am 12/18/2014 08:30 AM, schrieb shawphil...@aol.com: I do not understand your reply. OK, in more words: Attachments are not allowed on this mailing list. Therefore the server is stripping them off. So, your included error message is not visible. As you have no problem with the download

Re: [DISCUSS] No Suitable JRE Message

2014-12-18 Thread Marcus
Am 12/18/2014 03:01 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE). A suitable JRE is unavailable. For details http://openoffice.org/java.html; I am proposing this to avoid the various cases that arise, not just the 32-bit on x64 Windows

Re: Possible broken link: Checksums

2014-12-18 Thread Marcus
Am 12/18/2014 11:24 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 12/18/2014 09:34 PM, schrieb Arthur Gilman: In downloading only step one came up and after clicking on that, No step 2 - Nothing! Please explain in more details what you have down and where and what was expected. At the moment I don't know what you

RE: [DISCUSS] No Suitable JRE Message

2014-12-18 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
-- replying to -- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 14:36 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] No Suitable JRE Message Am 12/18/2014 03:01 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE).

Re: CentOS build box.

2014-12-18 Thread Kay Schenk
On 12/18/2014 02:22 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Michal Hriň wrote: On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote: My main concern at this point is the availability of security updates for this environment. I will be following up on a different thread about this. ...

Re: [DISCUSS] No Suitable JRE Message

2014-12-18 Thread Kay Schenk
On 12/18/2014 03:47 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -- replying to -- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 14:36 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] No Suitable JRE Message Am 12/18/2014 03:01 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:

140.211.11.74 + CVE-2014-0224

2014-12-18 Thread NoOp
On the user mailing list I posted the following on 12/09/2014: Andrea, You might want to take a closer look at your servers - certs are good but: This server is vulnerable to the OpenSSL CCS vulnerability (CVE-2014-0224) and exploitable. Grade set to F.

Re: Your stand proposal for Apache OpenOffice has been accepted

2014-12-18 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 18/12/2014 jan i wrote: On Thursday, December 18, 2014, RA Stehmann wrote: Hello, we, Mechtilde and me, hope to see you at FOSDEM 2015. I will be there, with apache stickers and a big smile. Great, and do we need pins too? See