+1 a roadmap is a must.
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:53 PM, FR web forum wrote:
> Hello dev,
> Is it possible to provide an explicit release date for next 4.2.0?
> To avoid a previous denigration campaign like for 4.1.2.
>
>
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:16 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 01/15/2016 12:18 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I believe we now have enough evidence that a serious issue, #125431,
> where
> > AOO lies that the password for encrypted files is wrong when it isn't, is
>but you need to innovate
What kind of innovating did you talking about?
If you have some ideas, you can propose to Bugzilla as feature or enhancement.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
Hello dev,
Is it possible to provide an explicit release date for next 4.2.0?
To avoid a previous denigration campaign like for 4.1.2.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hard to see that happens as MS is a sponsor of ASF... :
http://www.apache.org/foundation/thanks.html
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Chuck Davis wrote:
> But I agree that
> open source needs to take the innovation prize away from MS.
>
>
>
Very interesting, thank you.
Perhaps the reduced activity is an indication for the saturation state of
the project (i.e. all the possible bugs and features already exist in
Bugzilla)?
Is it possible to compare this information with other office suites?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Dennis E.
In line
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 16, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: donaldupre . [mailto:donaldu...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 04:51
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
>>
Great work!
Considering the nature of the issue, where users have important files they can
no longer open, I would think getting it into an early maintenance release
(e.g., a 4.1.3) along with many other fixes that don't impact UI, localization,
documentation, etc., would be a preferable
FR web forum wrote:
Is it possible to provide an explicit release date for next 4.2.0?
I believe that, to continue with a reasonable and sustainable pace, the
next release should (in theory) be targeted to February.
We don't lack code at the moment, since in 4.1.2 we included only a
Hello Andrea,
I have been adding words to the pt_PT autocorrect XML:
DocumentList.xml
So far I have added around 80-90 words.
I would like to update the official 2010 version of the file with my
version before AOO 4.2.0 is released.
What is the correct procedure? I know how to pack the
Carl Marcum wrote:
On 01/15/2016 07:20 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Can code like this be used as-is in an Apache project?
[1] https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2520
Your best option is probably to contact the author and ask him for
permission to use under the Apache License 2
Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
I would like to update the official 2010 version of the file with my
version before AOO 4.2.0 is released.
For sure this is not going to happen tomorrow. So we can go through
Bugzilla normally.
What is the correct procedure? I know how to pack the files and rename
to
On 01/16/2016 04:43 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Carl Marcum wrote:
On 01/15/2016 07:20 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Can code like this be used as-is in an Apache project?
[1] https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2520
Your best option is probably to contact the author and ask him
> -Original Message-
> From: donaldupre . [mailto:donaldu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2016 04:51
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; orc...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [REPORT] Issue Clearance Quality + Technical Debt
>
> Very interesting, thank you.
> Perhaps the reduced
14 matches
Mail list logo