Re: Which source files in release?

2016-09-30 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 9/30/2016 9:59 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: there is no need to reinvent the wheel, I guess ;) Indeed. I've bumped the bug report just to give visibility to the scripts we already had. you need to fix the ant build script first, see the bug report Fixing

Re: Introduction

2016-09-30 Thread John D'Orazio
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Xen wrote: > R. Mark Aldrich schreef op 28-09-2016 22:55: > > Section 5 starts with >> "A useful shortcut notation you will often see on the lists.", which >> makes sense if you read it as Yoda, but I think it would make more >> sense to

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

2016-09-30 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 9/30/2016 10:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection,

RE: Windows XP confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381

2016-09-30 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
This time, before running the 2016-09-29 installer, I uninstalled the previous AOO 4.1.3-dev install in my Windows XP VM. That installed fine. It appears that the checking for installed VC++ redistributables is invisible on Windows XP, but visible on Windows 10 Anniversary edition. On the XP

RE: Windows 10 Anniversary confirmation of AOO 4.1.3 r1761381

2016-09-30 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
I ran the install of the 2016-09-29 AOO4.1.3-dev r1761381 (still) to see how the VC++ redistributables worked. I saw the redistributables install again, apparently being newer as expected. The main AOO install did not run because the same version was detected as already installed. After

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

2016-09-30 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with me. I would be very happy

Re: Which source files in release?

2016-09-30 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: there is no need to reinvent the wheel, I guess ;) Indeed. I've bumped the bug report just to give visibility to the scripts we already had. you need to fix the ant build script first, see the bug report Fixing the script results in a commit. We agree that

Translate offline

2016-09-30 Thread Claudio Ferreia Filho
Hi i continue doing some translations to AOO, but I saw that translate.apache.org is offline. If someone can do something to warn the infra, is a good thing. Thanks in advance, Claudio Ferreira

Successfully built ApacheOO trunk in Debian Sid (Unstable)

2016-09-30 Thread Jose R R
Niltze, all- First time I build ApacheOO in Debian Sid for AMD64. I found this quirk towards the end of the build routine: [...] Calculating Installed-Size... Building Debian binary distribution... dpkg --build openoffice-core03_4.2.0-1_amd64 Packaging failed! Reason is target packaging requires

Re: Which source files in release?

2016-09-30 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:19:25AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > On Sep 30, 2016, at 07:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> I just saw the bug report

Re: Which source files in release?

2016-09-30 Thread Patricia Shanahan
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 07:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, >> "Make sure the source package does not contain extra files" >>

Re: Which source files in release?

2016-09-30 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, > "Make sure the source package does not contain extra files" > > Since our build instructions and processes are based on the result of an svn >

Re: Which source files in release?

2016-09-30 Thread Patricia Shanahan
I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605, "Make sure the source package does not contain extra files" Since our build instructions and processes are based on the result of an svn checkout, basing the source package on one seemed obvious to me. The only

4.1.4_release_blocker requested: [Issue 126605] Make sure the source package does not contain extra files

2016-09-30 Thread bugzilla
Andrea Pescetti has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker: Issue 126605: Make sure the source package does not contain extra files https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605 --- Comment #2 from Andrea Pescetti --- This is a good candidate for fixing

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

2016-09-30 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release > manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with me. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc

Re: Add This Feature to Writer ASAP

2016-09-30 Thread toki
On 30/09/2016 06:09, Kirk Fraser wrote: > The most needed feature is a book section organizer like Scrivner which has Organon jonathon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,