[status] Static webside migration

2019-09-19 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hello all, Can everyone interested in this topic give a short status? Short ping on the current availability. And list any impediments or difficulties that he currently sees where others can help with. I would very much like to see this take some drive. And I would love to see George

FOSDEM Dev room

2019-09-19 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hello all, Deadline is today. I am sorry I failed to come up with a proper application fo this event. Maybe Andrea, can you enter one on the short notice? If we get the room I would create a talk and support our dev room, but it is not primary motivation at the moment. I think it is much more

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

2019-09-19 Thread Don Lewis
Prioritizing the publication of the source tarball would be helpful. I can't publish the updated FreeBSD port until that happens, and the binary packages won't be available until a couple days after that. On 19 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: >

Re: FOSDEM 2020

2019-09-19 Thread Peter Kovacs
I do not feel good with these claims, but I am fine to use them. On 19.09.19 14:21, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Am 19.09.19 um 14:17 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: >> Hello and thank you very much. >> >> There is only one question left: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

2019-09-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release Am 19.09.19 um 23:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start > the process :) > >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

2019-09-19 Thread Peter Kovacs
sorry that I did not find the time for tests, and could only view from the peanut gallery. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.7 On 19.09.19 23:07, Jim Jagielski wrote: > OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start > the process :) > >>

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

2019-09-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start the process :) > On Sep 19, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? > Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

2019-09-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated vote. Matthias > >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> >> IMHO this vote is done and should be

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

2019-09-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? > On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any > more feedback. > > Time for the release. > >> Just FYI: >> I will be

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

2019-09-19 Thread Marcus
Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any more feedback. Time for the release. Just FYI: I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

2019-09-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Just FYI: I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening (European Time). Regards,    Matthias Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Cast

Re: git revision missing when building 4.1.7 from the source tarball

2019-09-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 19.09.19 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> On Sep 18, 2019, at 1:43 AM, Don Lewis wrote: >> >> If you build 4.1.7 starting with the source tarball, the git revision >> isn't included in the build result because the source tarball doesn't >> include the .git directory. That is needed

Re: FOSDEM 2020

2019-09-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Michael, Am 19.09.19 um 14:17 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: > Hello and thank you very much. > > There is only one question left: > > Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > >>> Description of project(s) for publication: >>> >>> Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite

Re: FOSDEM 2020

2019-09-19 Thread Dr. Michael Stehmann
Hello and thank you very much. There is only one question left: Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Description of project(s) for publication: >> >> Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle >> office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than

Re: git revision missing when building 4.1.7 from the source tarball

2019-09-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 1:43 AM, Don Lewis wrote: > > If you build 4.1.7 starting with the source tarball, the git revision > isn't included in the build result because the source tarball doesn't > include the .git directory. That is needed so that 'git log' can find > the most recent commit

Re: FOSDEM 2020

2019-09-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Michael, Small corrections inside: Am 17.09.19 um 09:57 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: > Hello, > > we are planning to join next FOSDEM like we did in the past. To get a > booth (stand) we have to write a request. The deadline for this request > will come soon. > > Among other things we have