Re: Building AOO42X under Debian9

Hello Ariel Am 01.11.19 um 22:35 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > Hi Mechtilde, > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:31 AM Mechtilde wrote: >> I tried o build the recent branch AOO42X under Debian 9. It stopped at >> building svx. > > I can sort of reproduce this, but with other modules, always if I >

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

On 31 Oct, arie...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > arielch pushed a commit to branch AOO42X > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git > > commit 0803cc9dcc220e6714fbf389f163ad96cd701b38 > Author: Ariel Constenla-

Re: Building AOO42X under Debian9

Hi Mechtilde, On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:31 AM Mechtilde wrote: > I tried o build the recent branch AOO42X under Debian 9. It stopped at > building svx. I can sort of reproduce this, but with other modules, always if I build with a single process; I guess you are building with build --all without

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

Hi Ariel, Am 01.11.19 um 18:20 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > Hi Matthias, > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:17 AM Matthias Seidel > wrote: >> C:/Source/openoffice/main/nss/wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/nss-3.25/nss/cmd/signtool/sign.c(85) >> : warning C4013: 'snprintf' undefined; assuming extern returni

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

Hi Ariel, Am 01.11.19 um 18:20 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > Hi Matthias, > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:17 AM Matthias Seidel > wrote: >> C:/Source/openoffice/main/nss/wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/nss-3.25/nss/cmd/signtool/sign.c(85) >> : warning C4013: 'snprintf' undefined; assuming extern returni

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

Hi Matthias, On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 6:17 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > C:/Source/openoffice/main/nss/wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/nss-3.25/nss/cmd/signtool/sign.c(85) > : warning C4013: 'snprintf' undefined; assuming extern returning int Try with commit 60374adc815ee4dfe39410d357c22db295ee1026 Are the

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

On 01.11.2019 12:11, Dave Fisher wrote: > Jim, > > It worked for Catalina and that is the goal. I don’t think a difference > should be expected for macOS prior to 10.15. > > Please check with Apple Developer documentation before letting FUD get you! Come on, it's not FUD. Just a normal install o

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

> On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >>> On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> I don't mind spending some cycles on figuring out how to sign the actual >>> app before it's packaged in

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

FWIW, this link seems to imply that simply signing and notarizing the DMG should be enough: https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/121813 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional comma

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

> On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Jim, > >> On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> I don't mind spending some cycles on figuring out how to sign the actual app >> before it's packaged into the dmg... > > Sure we can see if that makes a difference, but

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

Hi Jim, > On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I don't mind spending some cycles on figuring out how to sign the actual app > before it's packaged into the dmg... Sure we can see if that makes a difference, but the first question is if notarization makes any difference on any

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

I don't mind spending some cycles on figuring out how to sign the actual app before it's packaged into the dmg... Does anyone know if there is a build.pl option that sez "stop before packaging"? I don't see any from what I can see... > On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:11 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Jim, >

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

Jim, It worked for Catalina and that is the goal. I don’t think a difference should be expected for macOS prior to 10.15. Please check with Apple Developer documentation before letting FUD get you! Regards, Dave > On Nov 1, 2019, at 6:40 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> On Oct 31, 2019, a

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

Am 01.11.19 um 08:07 schrieb Dave Fisher: I am on macOS 10.15 Catalina and for me Notarization is an improvement. I also think it's better. At the moment the user has the options "Move to Trash" or "Cancel". Now with signed files there is an "Open" button. So, of course this is an improvement

Re: macOS Notarization test builds

> On Oct 31, 2019, at 5:20 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 31.10.2019 19:49, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Located at >> >>https://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO418-macOS-test/ >> >> Are some test macOS dmgs that should be correctly signed and notarized such >> that they do not trigger Ga

Building AOO42X under Debian9

Hello, I tried o build the recent branch AOO42X under Debian 9. It stopped at building svx. As described I tried again and get the attached log Kind regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Apache OpenOffice ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcom

Re: [openoffice] 03/03: Fixes from upstream for newer GCC

Hi all, This commit seems to break building on Windows (with MozillaBuild 3.2). Including the last lines from output: cd signtool; /usr/bin/make libs make[2]: Entering directory '/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/nss/wntmsci12.pro/misc/build/nss-3.25/nss/cmd/signtool' cl -Foout/sign.obj -c -O2