[QA] Verification Test Report macro

2020-12-27 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi All, For those that run the automated tests after a build. I wrote a Groovy macro to import the XML results from JUnit into Calc as another option besides the HTML reports. A short video on it's use and where to get it. https://youtu.be/mpC6gNUuWCY Please let me know if you have any

Odd Survey request to evaluate OpenOffice FYI

2020-12-27 Thread marcia wilbur
Hi. I received an odd request to evaluate OpenOffice in my linkedin. I believe my responses would be bias and a possible conflict of interest... ;) FYI Jed Fudally Hi marcia かおる, G2 wants your feedback! Write a review of your experience with OpenOffice, and we'll send you a $25 Amazon

Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)

2020-12-27 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Dec 27, 2020, at 5:13 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > >> On Dec 27, 2020, at 04:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> >>  >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 12:50 PM >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>>

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

2020-12-27 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - I made extensive edits for consistency and language. Patricia, please take a look if you wish. Regards, Dave > On Dec 27, 2020, at 9:20 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] >> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-27 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 01:46:46PM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote: > On 26.12.20 20:45, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS > > BigSur is > > unknown. It is this: > > > > > diff --git

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

2020-12-27 Thread Peter Kovacs
Thanks Jörg! Good move. I moved the parent to 4.1.9 Release notes and added the link to the section pre release blog post On 27.12.20 18:20, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM To:

RE: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

2020-12-27 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: > [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur) > > Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so

Re: [Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

2020-12-27 Thread Dave Fisher
Please put Peter’s text in a cwiki page so that it can be edited. We cannot promise a release by the end of the year. We should not imply that macOS Big Sur is the only reason for 4.1.9. All platforms will benefit. Thanks for your efforts. +1 once the text is properly edited. Regards, Dave

RE: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)

2020-12-27 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: dave [mailto:b...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:28 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes > because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?) > > On 27/12/2020 14:38, Jörg

[Consensus Building] What we should do now (was: [lazy consensus] ... Big Sur)

2020-12-27 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, I consider my proposal, by way of "lazy consensus" to have formally failed because "Bidouille" has objected. Now I wanted to put my proposal new for decision, but Peter's proposal (and also already finished draft text) I like better. Therefore I would like to propose:

Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)

2020-12-27 Thread dave
On 27/12/2020 14:38, Jörg Schmidt wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] >> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 2:13 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes >> because of Big Sur (was: How should we

Re: New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

2020-12-27 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 10:19:19PM +0100, Marcus wrote: > The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: > > Arrigo Marchiori > > Please give him a warm welcome. :-) Thank you, Marcus, and everybody, for your warm welcome! I am honored to be part of this group! Best

Re: Collection of material for a blog post on Big Sur (was: Addition in release notes because of Big Sur )

2020-12-27 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 27.12.20 15:29, Jörg Schmidt wrote: That, Peter, I also do not think! My formulations were not an outline taken in advance, but only 4 orders that should be filled with info, as a basis, as an orientation for the actual text of the blog post. sure, I just thought if we follwo this way,

RE: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)

2020-12-27 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 2:13 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes > because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?) > > > > On Dec 27,

RE: Collection of material for a blog post on Big Sur (was: Addition in release notes because of Big Sur )

2020-12-27 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 2:54 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Collection of material for a blog post on Big > Sur (was: Addition in release notes because of Big Sur ) > > I don't think a FaQ

Re: New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

2020-12-27 Thread Carl Marcum
Welcome to being a committer Arrigo! Thanks again for your help with the MWiki extension. I'm using the Dev Guide daily again! Best regards, Carl On 12/26/20 4:19 PM, Marcus wrote: The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: Arrigo Marchiori Please give him a

Re: New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

2020-12-27 Thread Czesław Wolański
Congratulations, Arrigo! You've made a very impressive start. Regards, Czesław

Re: Collection of material for a blog post on Big Sur (was: Addition in release notes because of Big Sur )

2020-12-27 Thread Peter Kovacs
I don't think a FaQ Format would be the right way to write about this issue.  I suggest something along the lines: Dear OpenOffice Users Thank you for taking interest into OpenOffice and your ongoing support over the years. As of late as you have heared through various channels, an Issue

AOO 4.1.9 Info

2020-12-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
The AOO419 branch has been created. The version numbers, et.al. have been bumped. The Release Status page has been cloned: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.9 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)

2020-12-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
> On Dec 27, 2020, at 04:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >  >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] >> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 12:50 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes >> because of Big

Collection of material for a blog post on Big Sur (was: Addition in release notes because of Big Sur )

2020-12-27 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> How about we make a blog post instead? Hello, because I support Peter's suggestion of a blog post, I want to contribute here also practically something to it by creating this thread here with the goal that we gather here info/facts. Anyone who knows something should please write it here

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-27 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 26.12.20 20:45, Jim Jagielski wrote: So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx index f4d6c56..2ca9b8f

RE: New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

2020-12-27 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello Arrigo, Be very welcome greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

RE: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)

2020-12-27 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 12:50 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes > because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?) > > How about we make a

Re: New Committer: Arrigo Marchiori

2020-12-27 Thread Peter Kovacs
Welcome Arrigo, I am very happy you have received the committer bit. And this is a start of a journey together. All the best and Merry Christmas! Peter On 26.12.20 22:19, Marcus wrote: The Apache OpenOffice project is happy to have a new committer on board: Arrigo Marchiori Please give

Re: [lazy consensus] Addition in release notes because of Big Sur (was: How should we proceed with BigSur?)

2020-12-27 Thread Peter Kovacs
How about we make a blog post instead? We can describe What the impact is. What Versions are affected. Where our research is. And what our plans are. On 25.12.20 16:52, Jörg Schmidt wrote: -Original Message- From: Dave Fisher [mailto:wave4d...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday,