Dear All,
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> hello Don,
>
> were you able to look into this, or the freeBsd volunteer.
>
> I can try to put together a report for gcc if you still like that to be
> done.
If you can carve out the necessary bits, and only them, and re
ardovm opened a new pull request, #198:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/198
The AOO41X branch does not seem to build on Ubuntu 22.04 "Jammy".
The purpose of this pull request is to gather and review the modifications
that make AOO41X build again.
The edits mostly
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:10 PM Marcus wrote:
> Am 16.01.24 um 17:50 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> > I've now pushed my "odf-1.3" branch upstream, which has some initial ODF
> > 1.3 compatibility patches, a patch adding a new constraint for the
> RECEIVED
> > function, and another to only make the
Am 16.01.24 um 17:50 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
I've now pushed my "odf-1.3" branch upstream, which has some initial ODF
1.3 compatibility patches, a patch adding a new constraint for the RECEIVED
function, and another to only make the upgrade dialog appear when version >
1.3.
There are 3 useful
Am 16.01.24 um 17:32 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus wrote:
I would like to move the other Wiki content into Confluence as
management is better there. However, it's may too much for my free time.
Even if you could move it, the mwiki would need to stay active as it
does not appear that cwiki
Hi Keith,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 5:32 PM Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> Marcus wrote:
> > I would like to move the other Wiki content into Confluence as
> > management is better there. However, it's may too much for my free time.
>
> Even if you could move it, the mwiki would need to stay active as
Hi
I've now pushed my "odf-1.3" branch upstream, which has some initial ODF
1.3 compatibility patches, a patch adding a new constraint for the RECEIVED
function, and another to only make the upgrade dialog appear when version >
1.3.
There are 3 useful parts to the ODF 1.3 specification, part 2 de
Marcus wrote:
I would like to move the other Wiki content into Confluence as
management is better there. However, it's may too much for my free time.
Even if you could move it, the mwiki would need to stay active as it
does not appear that cwiki has a file upload to use it to distribute or
do
