Hi;
Just to note that if you look at main/stlport/systemstl, you will see that if
everything else fails we would try to use's boost's TR1 as a replacement for a
decent STL. That approach doesn't really work anymore. Indeed FreeBSD's PPC64
AOO port appears broken with this message:
fails to compile:
aoo-4.2.0/main/solver/420/unxfbsdppc64.pro/inc/stl/vector:31:11: fatal error:
boost/tr1/tr1/vector: No such file or directory
Now, we could keep boost 1.64 and that would be an advance WRT what we have
today but... I would argue that a C++ compiler without a vector implementation
is *really* broken.
Just some food for thought. I am proposing an update to version 1.79, which
seems to be a sweet spot for the compilers we currently support.
Pedro.
