Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-21 Thread Carl Marcum
Sorry forgot to change the subject to DISCUSS - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-21 Thread Carl Marcum
[top posting] I'm 1 binding vote short of approval. If anyone is having trouble with this or running the test please let me know. Thanks, Carl On 02/11/2016 09:59 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: I have the release candidate staged in the Apache Nexus repository [1] that includes a separate source an

RE: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-16 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Carl, thanks for clearing that up. > -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 15:30 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven > > On 02/16/20

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-16 Thread Carl Marcum
On 02/16/2016 02:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Releases are releases. (We can discuss what the longer answer should be.) I also don't understand about staging to Maven already. Good question. - Dennis When artifacts are submitted to Apache Nexus staging area they are similar to rele

RE: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-16 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
9:56 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven > > > On 02/15/2016 04:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > In case it is useful in this case, be aware that it is the last > > vote cast by any individual that matters when

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-16 Thread Kay Schenk
epository? And, devtools is NOT part of our official release so I still don't understand the problem with putting it there. > >> -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum >> [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 >> 14:47 To: dev@openoffice.apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-16 Thread Carl Marcum
For those that are going to compile the source from the source jar and not from the Gradle build file in SVN Here is the file list ( filelist.txt ) ./ooo/connector/BootstrapConnector.java ./ooo/connector/BootstrapPipeConnector.java ./ooo/connector/BootstrapSocketConnector.java ./ooo/connector/ex

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-15 Thread Carl Marcum
On 02/15/2016 07:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: In case it is useful in this case, be aware that it is the last vote cast by any individual that matters when you finally count them. It is not necessary to end the voting if you fall short of the votes you need. You can leave the [VOTE] open

RE: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-15 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
affirmative binding votes. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 14:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven > > On 02/15/2016 0

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-15 Thread Carl Marcum
On 02/15/2016 05:21 PM, Marcus wrote: +0 I'm sorry but I cannot test anything with your RC as I'm not a developer and therefore don't know how to handle this. So, I cannot give you a positive vote for it. However, I would like to express at least my positive opinion with a "0+" and not with

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-12 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Pedro, On 02/12/2016 09:56 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi Carl; I am not objecting your initiative (plus my vote is not binding anyways), however ... That's okay, mine neither ;) It would seem to me that we shouldn't be voting for things outside the regular AOO releases. In other words, do

[DISCUSS] Release Java Bootstrap Connector via Maven

2016-02-12 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Carl; I am not objecting your initiative (plus my vote is not binding anyways), however ... It would seem to me that we shouldn't be voting for things outside the regular AOO releases. In other words, do we really need this distributed now or can't we just wait and release it along with AOO 4