This has been the case for years. Recall that the binary builds are community
convenience packages.
> On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and
> not Jim's (the Release Manager).
> The policy s
Hi Carl,
Am 10.07.22 um 22:56 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> On 7/10/22 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's
>> signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager).
>> The policy states [1] :
>> "All supplied packages MUST be cryptographica
On 7/10/22 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's
signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager).
The policy states [1] :
"All supplied packages MUST be cryptographically signed by the Release
Manager with a detached signature."
I
Hi All,
Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's
signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager).
The policy states [1] :
"All supplied packages MUST be cryptographically signed by the Release
Manager with a detached signature."
I understand the logistics and that Matthi