On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:28:44PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
>> The native-lang "product" has a separate "component" for each locale.
>> That was a change from the legacy OOo BZ where each NL project had its
>> own top-level "product".
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:28:44PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
> The native-lang "product" has a separate "component" for each locale.
> That was a change from the legacy OOo BZ where each NL project had its
> own top-level "product". I think this is an improvement, since the
> old structure cluttered
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:28:44PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to assign to the right "Product" category a bug related to
> > i18n, and realized we have no such category of its own, it's merged with
> > i10n
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to assign to the right "Product" category a bug related to
> i18n, and realized we have no such category of its own, it's merged with
> i10n, while there are other obsolete categories and some others that
> overl
Hi,
I was trying to assign to the right "Product" category a bug related to
i18n, and realized we have no such category of its own, it's merged with
i10n, while there are other obsolete categories and some others that
overlap:
- api: This is the application programming interface.
- app dev: Issu