Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-27 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 01:46:46PM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote: > On 26.12.20 20:45, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS > > BigSur is > > unknown. It is this: > > > > > diff --git

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-27 Thread Peter Kovacs
On 26.12.20 20:45, Jim Jagielski wrote: So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx index f4d6c56..2ca9b8f

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 26.12.20 um 21:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I have uploaded a test build of en-US AOO419-dev for macOS. I have confirmed > on my macOS11/BigSur VM that this version opens docx files w/ no problems, > edits and saves them, etc... > > Please test: > >

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 26.12.20 um 21:59 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I have uploaded a test build of en-US AOO419-dev for macOS. I have confirmed > on my macOS11/BigSur VM that this version opens docx files w/ no problems, > edits and saves them, etc... > > Please test: > >

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
BUGZ seems to be a build issue, not a code one, but it still needs to be fixed and noted, likely with some autoconf checks that fakeroot exists. > On Dec 26, 2020, at 3:43 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> So there is for sure a bug

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
I have uploaded a test build of en-US AOO419-dev for macOS. I have confirmed on my macOS11/BigSur VM that this version opens docx files w/ no problems, edits and saves them, etc... Please test: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ Cheers! > On Dec 26, 2020, at 3:54 PM, Rory O'Farrell

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 21:43:06 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS > > BigSur is > > unknown. It is this: > > > >> diff --git

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Marcus
Am 26.12.20 um 21:43 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 26.12.20 um 20:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS > BigSur is > unknown. It is this: > >> diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx >> b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated: Force SDK 10.11 at most Pass NULL, not -1 (!!)

2020-12-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
So there is for sure a bug in AOO41X, but why it only seems to affect macOS BigSur is unknown. It is this: > diff --git a/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx > b/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/shared/vtablefactory.cxx > index f4d6c56..2ca9b8f 100644 > ---