Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

+1 > On Sep 30, 2019, at 4:03 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Great! > > One additional thought: > > We use $Revision$ in main/solenv/bin/build.pl and a lot of other files. > That doesn't seem to work anymore since we switched from SVN to Git. > > We have AC_REVISION(

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi Jim, Great! One additional thought: We use $Revision$ in main/solenv/bin/build.pl and a lot of other files. That doesn't seem to work anymore since we switched from SVN to Git. We have AC_REVISION( $Revision$ ) in configure.ac. Maybe we can replace the logic [1]. Regards,    Matthias [1]

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

I have an idea on how to include the git hash on the source distro... will try to work on it this week. > On Sep 26, 2019, at 7:58 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > > On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> Am 20.09.19 um 06:47 schrieb Don Lewis: >>> Prioritizing the publication of the source

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

On 26 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Don, > > Am 20.09.19 um 06:47 schrieb Don Lewis: >> Prioritizing the publication of the source tarball would be helpful. I >> can't publish the updated FreeBSD port until that happens, and the >> binary packages won't be available until a couple days after

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi Don, Am 20.09.19 um 06:47 schrieb Don Lewis: > Prioritizing the publication of the source tarball would be helpful. I > can't publish the updated FreeBSD port until that happens, and the > binary packages won't be available until a couple days after that. How was it done in the past? As I

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

I can do Facebook. But I do not have any access. I have answered some other post in the Commets if someone can grant me rights. All the best Peter Am 22. September 2019 12:35:11 MESZ schrieb Torokhov Sergey : >Hello. > >Please update the github tag for 4.1.7 release. There is only 4.7.1 RC1

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hello. Please update the github tag for 4.1.7 release. There is only 4.7.1 RC1 tag. Also there are no news on twitter and facebook pages. 20.09.2019, 18:29, "Matthias Seidel" : > Hi Jim, > > Am 20.09.19 um 15:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>  FTR: The Vote is now CLOSED with the result that

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 21.09.19 um 16:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Looking at the staged area, all binaries and sources are up on SF great, in the meantime I've done the work to get the release on the street. Marcus On Sep 21, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 20.09.19 um 17:55 schrieb Matthias Seidel:

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Looking at the staged area, all binaries and sources are up on SF > On Sep 21, 2019, at 8:23 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 20.09.19 um 17:55 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> @Marcus: >> I took care of https://openoffice.apache.org/ (locally, not uploaded yet). >> The only thing I need is the official

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 20.09.19 um 17:55 schrieb Matthias Seidel: @Marcus: I took care of https://openoffice.apache.org/ (locally, not uploaded yet). The only thing I need is the official release date... ;-) when it's available on Sourceforge and I can enable our download webpage, so I would take that day as

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

"Make sure builds are on the ASF Archive server" https://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.7/ Check! Am 20.09.19 um 17:55 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > @Marcus: > > I took care of https://openoffice.apache.org/ (locally, not uploaded yet). > > The only thing I need is the official release

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

@Marcus: I took care of https://openoffice.apache.org/ (locally, not uploaded yet). The only thing I need is the official release date... ;-) Matthias Am 20.09.19 um 17:29 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > Am 20.09.19 um 15:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> FTR: The Vote is now CLOSED with

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi Jim, Am 20.09.19 um 15:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > FTR: The Vote is now CLOSED with the result that releasing AOO417-RC1 as > AOO417-GA is approved. > > As such, I will now start the Upload process as per: > > >

[VOTE CLOSED] Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

FTR: The Vote is now CLOSED with the result that releasing AOO417-RC1 as AOO417-GA is approved. As such, I will now start the Upload process as per: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release#HowtoCookaRelease-Uploads

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Prioritizing the publication of the source tarball would be helpful. I can't publish the updated FreeBSD port until that happens, and the binary packages won't be available until a couple days after that. On 19 Sep, Matthias Seidel wrote: >

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release Am 19.09.19 um 23:07 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start > the process :) > >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

sorry that I did not find the time for tests, and could only view from the peanut gallery. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.7 On 19.09.19 23:07, Jim Jagielski wrote: > OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start > the process :) > >>

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

OK, thanks. Once I find, again, the 4.1.7-RC1 release Wiki page, I'll start the process :) > On Sep 19, 2019, at 5:03 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? > Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 19.09.19 um 23:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? Yes, I did. Forgot to mention it in my updated vote. Matthias > >> On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> >> IMHO this vote is done and should be

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Has anyone tested the rebuilt Linux distros? > On Sep 19, 2019, at 3:42 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any > more feedback. > > Time for the release. > >> Just FYI: >> I will be

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 19.09.19 um 16:40 schrieb Matthias Seidel: IMHO this vote is done and should be closed. I don't think that we get any more feedback. Time for the release. Just FYI: I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Just FYI: I will be without Internet access from Saturday to Sunday. If RC1 will be voted to be released I can help with the process until Friday and will be happy to join again on Sunday (late) evening (European Time). Regards,    Matthias Am 16.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Cast

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

The Release Candidate is good for production: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [ ] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have build and tested the RC from source [ ] I have tested the binary RC Tested on FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE.

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Here is my (updated) vote: --- The Release Candidate is good for production: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [X] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have build and tested the RC from source [X] I have tested the binary RC --- Additional information: - Built binaries (all

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Cast vote > On Sep 11, 2019, at 1:31 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hi all, > > > In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) > > Please take your vote. > > The Release Candidate is good for production: > > [X] yes / +1 > > [ ] no / -1 > > My vote is based on

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Just a FYI: I have committed replacement builds for Linux32 and Linux64 and these are now on https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.7-RC1/ There were no code changes at all. I simply rebuilt after setting git config --global core.abbrev 10 to ensure that the Git short

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 11.09.19 um 07:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs: In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) Please take your vote. The Release Candidate is good for production: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [X] binding (member of PMC) [ ] I have build and tested

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 12.09.19 um 18:55 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: On 9/12/2019 12:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I think the normal 3days makes sense... What does everyone else think? 3 days should be fine. I think release votes have a bigger effort then other topics. So IMHO it MUST go over a weekend. Otherwise

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

+1 On 12.09.19 18:25, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I think the normal 3days makes sense... What does everyone else think? > >> On Sep 12, 2019, at 7:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> >> How long will you allow for testing of the Linux builds between the rebuild >> and releasing them? >> >> Patricia

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

On 9/12/2019 12:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I think the normal 3days makes sense... What does everyone else think? 3 days should be fine. Regards Keith > >> On Sep 12, 2019, at 7:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> >> How long will you allow for testing of the Linux builds between the rebuild

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 12.09.19 um 18:25 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I think the normal 3days makes sense... What does everyone else think? +1 Matthias > >> On Sep 12, 2019, at 7:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> >> How long will you allow for testing of the Linux builds between the rebuild >> and releasing them?

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

I think the normal 3days makes sense... What does everyone else think? > On Sep 12, 2019, at 7:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > How long will you allow for testing of the Linux builds between the rebuild > and releasing them? > > Patricia > >> On Sep 11, 2019, at 18:30, Jim Jagielski

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

How long will you allow for testing of the Linux builds between the rebuild and releasing them? Patricia > On Sep 11, 2019, at 18:30, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > If RC1 passes, and I do think it is a Good Idea to have a longer-than-normal > vote, then the macOS and Windows builds will move,

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

If RC1 passes, and I do think it is a Good Idea to have a longer-than-normal vote, then the macOS and Windows builds will move, as-is, to the release state; The Linux binaries will be rebuilt, but with no code changes at all, to fix the git short-hash inconsistency between macOS/Win and the

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

The test builds and source code can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.7-RC1/ Cheers! > On Sep 11, 2019, at 7:36 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Maybe I am confused: Where is RC1? I believe we tested

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi Matthias, I m sorry I am super nervous about the 12th and I feared with all the discussion that we will not vote at all or to late. So I just started it. The rc was announced by Jim on the 6th Sept. with the intend to start a vote on Monday. There was this discussion but it ended with the

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi all, Here is my vote: --- The Release Candidate is good for production: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [X] binding (member of PMC) [X] I have build and tested the RC from source [X] I have tested the binary RC --- Additional information: - Built binaries for Windows

RE: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Mon, Peter Kovacs schrieb:​ > > Hi all, > > > In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) > > Please take your vote. > > The Release Candidate is good for production: > > [X] yes / +1 > > [ ] no / -1 > > My vote is based on > > [ ] binding (member of PMC) >

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hello I have downloaded and used it a this evening a little bit. It is ok for me. the last fixes esp. with the detection of Java works so +1 for me (binding) Kind regards Am 11.09.19 um 20:38 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Peter, > > before we start a vote people should have the opportunity

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi Peter, before we start a vote people should have the opportunity to download RC1 and test it: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.7-RC1/ Regards,    Matthias Am 11.09.19 um 07:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Hi all, > > > In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim,

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi Matthias > On September 11, 2019 at 2:41 PM Matthias Seidel < > matthias.sei...@hamburg.de mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > As always you will find it on the ASF dist server in the dev area: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.7-RC1/ > Ok.

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi Pedro, Am 11.09.19 um 14:45 schrieb Mechtilde: > > Am 11.09.19 um 13:36 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Maybe I am confused: Where is RC1? I believe we tested some build to check >> if source was ready to build RC1? > http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO417-test/Rev-46059c9/ No, this is *NOT*

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 11.09.19 um 13:36 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Maybe I am confused: Where is RC1? I believe we tested some build to check if > source was ready to build RC1? http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/AOO417-test/Rev-46059c9/ > > A second question: now that source move to git, what is the command to

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Maybe I am confused: Where is RC1? I believe we tested some build to check if source was ready to build RC1? A second question: now that source move to git, what is the command to download source for branch 4.1.7 to build from source? Thanks! > On September 11, 2019 at 6:31 AM Peter Kovacs

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

The Release Candidate is good for production: [X] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [X] binding (member of PMC) [ ] I have build and tested the RC from source [X] I have tested the binary RC Regards Keith signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [vote] AOO417-RC1​

Am 11.09.19 um 07:31 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Hi all, > > > In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) > > Please take your vote. > > The Release Candidate is good for production: > > [X] yes / +1 > > [ ] no / -1 > > My vote is based on > > [X] binding

[vote] AOO417-RC1​

Hi all, In order to finalize the release, I jump in for Jim, who is traveling. :-) Please take your vote. The Release Candidate is good for production: [ ] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 My vote is based on [ ] binding (member of PMC) [ ] I have build and tested the RC from source [ ] I have