Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-07-31 Thread Kay sch...@apache.org
On 07/30/2016 09:51 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > The problem is definitely in r1409590, in the LinkTarget.mk patch. > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > >> I've narrowed this Windows build performance regression down to the >> original branches/gbuild commits 1409589

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-07-30 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
The problem is definitely in r1409590, in the LinkTarget.mk patch. On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > I've narrowed this Windows build performance regression down to the > original branches/gbuild commits 1409589 and 1409590, which go together and > can't be split up. > >

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-07-28 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
I've narrowed this Windows build performance regression down to the original branches/gbuild commits 1409589 and 1409590, which go together and can't be split up. * r1409589: gnumake4: #i117845#: LinkTarget.mk: fix dep-files for GenCxxObjects: pass the dep-file target explicitly as a parameter to

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-07-22 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
The Windows build performance regression first occurs in r1735004, which takes 676 minutes to build compared to 330 minutes in the commit just before it. Only wall clock time increases, "user" and "system" times remain the same. 4 patches from branches/gbuild were merged in that commit. 3 of them

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-07-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Damjan; I am back to gbuild, have moved my Windows VM's disk to the faster ext3 filesystem, and have begun doing the only thing I can think of to debug this: manually "bisection testing" the gbuild-reintegration branch to try isolate which patch causes the build performance regression. There

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-07-20 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
I am back to gbuild, have moved my Windows VM's disk to the faster ext3 filesystem, and have begun doing the only thing I can think of to debug this: manually "bisection testing" the gbuild-reintegration branch to try isolate which patch causes the build performance regression. There is 136 patche

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-05-23 Thread Kay Schenk
On 05/05/2016 10:51 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Windows XP SP3 32-bit on a VirtualBox instance on FreeBSD, underlying filesystem is ZFS which does cause I/O slowdown, but not enough to explain this. Can't remember what compiler I installed; there are Windows SDK 7 and Visual Studio 9 directories

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-05-05 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Windows XP SP3 32-bit on a VirtualBox instance on FreeBSD, underlying filesystem is ZFS which does cause I/O slowdown, but not enough to explain this. Can't remember what compiler I installed; there are Windows SDK 7 and Visual Studio 9 directories. SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft S

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-05-05 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Unfortunately I discovered a major problem with the > gbuild-reintegration branch: on Windows, the build time of trunk is > about 3-4 hours, but it's over 12 hours to build gbuild-reintegration > :-(. I don't have time to investigate soon

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-05-03 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Thank you for the report Damjan :( Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-05-03 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Unfortunately I discovered a major problem with the gbuild-reintegration branch: on Windows, the build time of trunk is about 3-4 hours, but it's over 12 hours to build gbuild-reintegration :-(. I don't have time to investigate soon, nor do I know where to even begin... On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:20

Any chance to merge the gbuild branch rather soonish?

2016-05-02 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; FWIW, I am preparing a second round of spelling fixes ... it's a quite big change. I would prefer to do such changes *after* the new build system is in place though. I can deal easily with any breakage caused by the spelling fixes but it may not be very fun to have to fix again the build