Hi Andrea,
2014-09-09 20:58 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti :
> Guy Waterval wrote:
>
>> Not possible for a developer to use a double licence ?
>>
>
> Sure it is possible. And it is also possible for the copyright holder to
> add the Apache 2 license to work previously released under other, usually
>
On 09.09.2014 20:58, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Guy Waterval wrote:
>> Not possible for a developer to use a double licence ?
>
> Sure it is possible. And it is also possible for the copyright holder to
> add the Apache 2 license to work previously released under other,
> usually more restrictive, l
On 10/09/2014 Markus Wernig wrote:
OK, this sounds like good news. So if the developers of the original
(currently broken) code and those of the (to be developed) fix agree to,
eg. license it under both MPL and AL, we could use both code parts in
both LO and AOO?
Even Apache License version 2 (
Hi all
Sorry, one reply to two posts, but they seem so much related, it would
be hard to separate them ...
On 09/09/2014 08:58 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Guy Waterval wrote:
>> Not possible for a developer to use a double licence ?
>
> Sure it is possible. And it is also possible for the copyr
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Markus Wernig wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 03:31 PM, Vladislav Stevanovic wrote:
> >> Background: I am currently trying to get some devs together to fix a
> >> feature (creating digitally signed PDFs) that exists under the
> >> "experimental" features of LO (and does not
Guy Waterval wrote:
Not possible for a developer to use a double licence ?
Sure it is possible. And it is also possible for the copyright holder to
add the Apache 2 license to work previously released under other,
usually more restrictive, licenses.
Or maybe the double licence is only poss
Hi Michael,
>
> That's a problem of licenses. The Apache License has no so called
> copyleft, so LibreOffice can use our code. But LibreOffice uses licences
> with a (weak) copyleft, so we can't use their code, if the developer
> doesn't use also the Apache License (v 2.0) for his or hers code.
>
On 09.09.2014 15:10, Markus Wernig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Obviously there are some features in AOO that do not exist in LO and
> vice versa.
>
> I was wondering what the current possibilities are to get certain
> features from LO integrated into AOO.
>
> Background: I am currently trying to get som
On 09/09/2014 03:31 PM, Vladislav Stevanovic wrote:
>> Background: I am currently trying to get some devs together to fix a
>> feature (creating digitally signed PDFs) that exists under the
>> "experimental" features of LO (and does not work at the moment). If that
>> should succeed, I would like t
>From LibO to AOO, I already posted this question one year ago:
http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/LibO-code-will-be-integrated-to-AOO-td4649464.html
- Mail original -
De: "Markus Wernig"
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Mardi 9 Septembre 2014 15:10:01
Objet: Fe
>Background: I am currently trying to get some devs together to fix a
>feature (creating digitally signed PDFs) that exists under the
>"experimental" features of LO (and does not work at the moment). If that
>should succeed, I would like to see that feature also in AOO.
I am not an expert but, as
Hi all
Obviously there are some features in AOO that do not exist in LO and
vice versa.
I was wondering what the current possibilities are to get certain
features from LO integrated into AOO.
Background: I am currently trying to get some devs together to fix a
feature (creating digitally signed
12 matches
Mail list logo
