Peter Junge wrote:
What is the conclusion of this vote? As far as I understand the Apache
philosophy, such votes are no majority votes but consensus is the goal.
Conclusion is that Jan is the person I will recommend for replacing me.
The vote outcome determines the new Chair.
A a
[mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2015 02:24
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
Peter Junge wrote:
What is the conclusion of this vote? As far as I understand the Apache
philosophy, such votes are no majority votes
Il 20/01/2015 00:29, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:32, Kay Schenk wrote:
I am probably seeming very disagreeable here.
... Andrea and others believe that the election
process has proceeded as it ought to have, with enough time allowed
for discussion and then vote. But you
On 20/01/15 00:29, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:32, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I am probably seeming very disagreeable here.
Nope. You'll have to try harder :-)
More seriously, you point to a flaw that was not evident on an abstract level
but was in
My view is more positive. Louis has at least one thing in his favour - long
term experience. Also I think he has a clear track record of commitment to
the project in difficult times. I have had differences with him in the
past, but I think that is just part of any pluralist system. I don't
Briefly,
On 20 Jan 2015, at 05:42, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
My view is more positive. Louis has at least one thing in his favour - long
term experience. Also I think he has a clear track record of commitment to
the project in difficult times. I have had differences with him in
On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:32, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
I am probably seeming very disagreeable here.
Nope. You'll have to try harder :-)
More seriously, you point to a flaw that was not evident on an abstract level
but was in practice. I had an IM conversation with Andrea over
+1
On 19 January 2015 at 00:27, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 17/01/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
It's true the two last nominees -- Jan and Louis -- did discuss their
views at length, but there was not really much discussion on the
selections from this list. Contrast this from the
On 01/18/2015 04:27 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 17/01/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
It's true the two last nominees -- Jan and Louis -- did discuss their
views at length, but there was not really much discussion on the
selections from this list. Contrast this from the discussions that
preceded
we'll see.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 06:06
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote
-- replying below to --
From: Michal Hriň [mailto:michal.h...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 01:48
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair
V Štvrtok, 15. január 2015 o 09:04 +0100, Andrea Pescetti napísal
On 15/01/2015 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I also think that there is a serious misunderstanding of
what it means to be PMC Chair.
I will comment on a few items only, merely for clarifying previous
discussions. I think Dennis is right here, but I explained the Chair
role at the beginning, I
Am 15.01.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Procedural note: I didn't add it to my initial mail in order to keep it
short, but it is highly recommended that -1 votes be accompanied by a
brief motivation (1-2 lines), especially if you haven't participated in
the discussions so far. Knowing
V Štvrtok, 15. január 2015 o 09:04 +0100, Andrea Pescetti napísal(a):
On 15/01/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Do you approve that, in his capacity as the Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair,
Andrea Pescetti submits a resolution to the Board asking to be replaced
by Louis Suárez-Potts as the Apache
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:57:43 +0100
Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
O.Felka wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Procedural note: I didn't add it to my initial mail in order to keep it
short, but it is highly recommended that -1 votes be accompanied by a
brief
O.Felka wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Procedural note: I didn't add it to my initial mail in order to keep it
short, but it is highly recommended that -1 votes be accompanied by a
brief motivation (1-2 lines), especially if you haven't participated in
the discussions so
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
O.Felka wrote:
Am 15.01.2015 um 09:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Procedural note: I didn't add it to my initial mail in order to keep it
short, but it is highly recommended that -1 votes be accompanied by a
brief
17 matches
Mail list logo
