Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

2021-08-08 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 08.08.21 um 15:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > These are developer previews and not actual Releases so I don't think so. > Easy to add though. Thanks! I think they are needed when we publish builds as AOO project. Personal builds don't... Windows builds are also complete now! Regards,   

Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

2021-08-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
These are developer previews and not actual Releases so I don't think so. Easy to add though. > On Aug 7, 2021, at 7:28 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-) > > BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server? > >

Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

2021-08-07 Thread Matthias Seidel
Don't expect Windows binaries before tomorrow... ;-) BTW: Aren't we required to give signatures and hashes on the Apache server? Matthias Am 06.08.21 um 16:49 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > >> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> That's c9282f5c5c ? > Yep. That's right! >>

Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

2021-08-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Aug 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > That's c9282f5c5c ? Yep. That's right! > > Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only > single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0. > Yikes!

Re: AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

2021-08-06 Thread Matthias Seidel
That's c9282f5c5c ? Building for Windows now. Might take some time, since I can do only single threaded build with Cygwin 3.2.0. Matthias Am 06.08.21 um 13:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds. > >

AOO420-Dev3-m3 (Was: Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?)

2021-08-06 Thread Jim Jagielski
I have tagged AOO420-Dev3-m3 and am working on the builds. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-08-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
I think I will tag tomorrow morning and start some builds :-) > On Aug 3, 2021, at 12:48 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Ready, when you are! ;-) > > Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS: >> >> Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-) >>

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-08-03 Thread Matthias Seidel
Ready, when you are! ;-) Am 03.08.21 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS: > > Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-) > > A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is > thrown when accessing it. The exception

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-08-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'd like to spend some time on the ODS bug on macOS: Executive Summary (TL;DR ;-) A boolean setting is not recognized as a boolean. An exception is thrown when accessing it. The exception is swallowed and the XML files' contents are not written. > On Aug 3, 2021, at

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-08-03 Thread Matthias Seidel
I would be able to upload the Windows binaries now... @Jim: Can you create a tag on GitHub and provide macOS and Linux builds? Regards,    Matthias Am 01.08.21 um 23:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi, > > Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on > Git hash

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-08-01 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi, Just FYI: I just build a AOO420-Dev3 for Windows (as a test) based on Git hash 494e99f846. Regards,    Matthias Am 31.07.21 um 17:26 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi all, > > Next weekend? Any idea? > > Matthias > > Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi all, >> >> Am 27.07.21 um

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-07-31 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, Next weekend? Any idea? Matthias Am 29.07.21 um 15:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi all, > > Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello All, >> >> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> Hi Jim, >>> >>> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-07-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, Am 27.07.21 um 19:11 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello All, > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> Snapshot works for me >> Great! What do others think? >> >> Commits are low at the moment, so

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-07-27 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello All, On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:56:25PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > > Snapshot works for me > > Great! What do others think? > > Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... +1 -- Arrigo

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-07-27 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 27.07.21 um 17:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Snapshot works for me Great! What do others think? Commits are low at the moment, so we could start any time... Matthias > >> On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-07-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Snapshot works for me > On Jul 23, 2021, at 10:43 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'm ready for a dev3... > > That's great! > > Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot", > maybe with the latest

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-07-25 Thread Matthias Seidel
@Mechtilde: Any thoughts on the translation? Regards,    Matthias Am 23.07.21 um 16:43 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I'm ready for a dev3... > That's great! > > Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot", >

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-07-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 16.07.21 um 13:39 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > I'm ready for a dev3... That's great! Are there any patches in the pipeline or do we want to do a "snapshot", maybe with the latest translations? Regards,    Matthias > >> On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel >> wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-07-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'm ready for a dev3... > On Jun 29, 2021, at 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Keith, > > Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: On Sat,

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Keith, Am 30.06.21 um 01:17 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi Keith, >> >> Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> 3 month later, I assume there is no

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-29 Thread Keith N. McKenna
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:54:13 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Keith, > > Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> >>> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>>    Matthias

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-29 Thread Aivaras Stepukonis
That'd be great! Regards, Aivaras 2021-06-29 13:00, Matthias Seidel rašė: Updated translations should be part of every 4.2.x release in the future.

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Aivaras, Am 27.06.21 um 10:29 schrieb Aivaras Stepukonis: > Hi, > > I welcome any step that brings us closer to v4.2. There has been done > quite a bit in the translations that sits in Pootle for years without > reaching the users. We should be updating the translations more often. That is

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-29 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Keith, Am 26.06.21 um 19:01 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? >> >> Regards, >> >>    Matthias >> > Mathias; > Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-27 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Matthias, On 6/27/21 12:17 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Carl, Am 27.06.21 um 13:16 schrieb Carl Marcum: Hi Matthias, On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? That's okay with me. I hope you are OK with doing a dev3?

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-27 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Carl, Am 27.06.21 um 13:16 schrieb Carl Marcum: > Hi Matthias, > > On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? > > That's okay with me. I hope you are OK with doing a dev3? ;-) Regards,    Matthias > > Best regards, >

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-27 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Matthias, On 6/26/21 10:55 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? That's okay with me. Best regards, Carl Regards,    Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-27 Thread Aivaras Stepukonis
Hi, I welcome any step that brings us closer to v4.2. There has been done quite a bit in the translations that sits in Pootle for years without reaching the users. We should be updating the translations more often. Regards, Aivaras 2021-06-26 17:55, Matthias Seidel rašė: 3 month later, I

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-26 Thread Keith N. McKenna
On Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:55:52 +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote: > 3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? > > Regards, > >    Matthias > Mathias; Given the changes in Bugzilla I believe that it is time for a dev 3 build. We really also need to either start working on the

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-06-26 Thread Matthias Seidel
3 month later, I assume there is no interest in releasing a Dev3? Regards,    Matthias Am 23.03.21 um 16:54 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Jim, > > I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. > > That means 41+5 languages: > >

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-03-23 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, I would suggest we build the same language set as in Dev 2. That means 41+5 languages: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/4.2.0-Dev2/wntmsci/Pack-dev.lst @Mechtilde: What about new Pootle templates? We had a lot of string changes... Regards,    Matthias

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-03-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
In an effort to save some time and resources, can we confirm on whether or not we are building the full language set? > On Mar 20, 2021, at 2:04 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have created the directory structure for Dev3: > >

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-03-20 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, I have created the directory structure for Dev3: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.2.0-Dev3/ Regards,    Matthias Am 17.03.21 um 18:00 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi Arrigo, > > Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: >> Hello, >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-03-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Arrigo, Am 16.03.21 um 21:53 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Hello, > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The subject says it all... ;-) >> >> No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated >> translations from Pootle here. > I

Re: Time for a 4.2.0-dev3?

2021-03-16 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello, On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:26:53PM +0100, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > The subject says it all... ;-) > > No exact time frame, but we could include a full set of updated > translations from Pootle here. I would also like to have some pull requests merged, if possible! And I am