On 27 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 26.08.20 um 03:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
> For some reason that bogus file is
Hi Don,
Am 26.08.20 um 03:55 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>>> Yep. That
Hi Don, Matthias, all
> On 08/26/2020 6:09 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> I just updated AOO418 with the fix. You should be able to successfully
> build and run --without-system-stdlibs.
I have successfully compiled 418 under Ubuntu 18.04 x64 (without any
system-stdlibs switch, which I assume
On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>>
On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>>
Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>>>
>>> Yep. That fixed
On 25 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
>>> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>>
>> Yep. That fixed it. It doesn't make any sense to me
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
>> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
>
> Yep. That fixed it. It doesn't make any sense to me that an extra file
> prevents the
> On 08/25/2020 8:35 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Try deleting /opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1
> For some reason that bogus file is getting packaged by your build.
Yep. That fixed it. It doesn't make any sense to me that an extra file prevents
the program from working... Maybe this is part
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information?
>
> Didn't think about that :)
>
> /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries:
>
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
>> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
>
>> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information?
>
> Didn't think about that :)
>
> /opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries:
>
Hi Don
> On 08/25/2020 8:29 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> For me, it goes through the registration process and then I can create
> and save a writer document. If I exit, I can reopen the document from
> the command line. Looks like it works.
Sounds like a good one ;)
Can you upload it somewhere and
On 25 Aug, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 25.08.20 um 20:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> Hi Don
>>
>>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 and
>>> using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
>> After
Hi Matthias
> On 08/25/2020 8:07 PM Matthias Seidel wrote:
> If you start AOO in a shell with "soffice", does that give some information?
Didn't think about that :)
/opt/openoffice4/program/javaldx: error while loading shared libraries:
/opt/openoffice4/program/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid ELF
Hi Pedro,
Am 25.08.20 um 20:11 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Don
>
>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 and
>> using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
> After updating with your latest changes and hacking a
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don
>
>> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418
>> and using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
>
> After updating with your latest changes and hacking a bit with the
>
Hi Don
> On 08/25/2020 10:59 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> With the latest batch of cherry-picks that I just pushed to AOO418 and
> using OpenJDK 8, I was able to build AOO418 on Ubuntu 18.
After updating with your latest changes and hacking a bit with the libgcc file
mentioned in the subject,
On 25 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On 08/25/2020 3:47 AM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> It's one of the bug fixes that I
>> plan to cherry-pick for AOO418 tonight.
>
> Excellent! Thanks!
>
>> What version of OpenJDK are you using? I'm seeing a fair amount of
>> fallout from OpenJDK 11.
>
> I have
> On 08/25/2020 3:47 AM Don Lewis wrote:
> It's one of the bug fixes that I
> plan to cherry-pick for AOO418 tonight.
Excellent! Thanks!
> What version of OpenJDK are you using? I'm seeing a fair amount of
> fallout from OpenJDK 11.
I have both 8 and 11
sudo update-alternatives --config
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build? Has the offuh module been built and
>> delivered? Seems oa little dd that offuh is not listed as a dependency
>> in sax/prj/build.lst, but it is listed as a dependency of cppuhelper and
>>
On 24 Aug, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
>> Hi Don, all
>>
>>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> Is this a parallel build?
>>
>> Switched to single thread building
>>
>> build --all
>>
>> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
>>
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
>
Hi Don
> On 08/24/2020 4:58 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> The actual error should show up as "error: " in the build output.
The error messages and compiling stop at a completely different step on each
run even if I do a dmake clean and repeat the exact same 3 steps.
Adding --enable-verbose did not
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
>
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Hi Don, all
>
>> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Is this a parallel build?
>
> Switched to single thread building
>
> build --all
>
> when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
>
Hi Don, all
> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Is this a parallel build?
Switched to single thread building
build --all
when it stopped I followed the suggestion by Rigo and deleted
/source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
and restarted with build --all:icu
> On 08/24/2020 3:18 PM Don Lewis wrote:
> Is this a parallel build? Has the offuh module been built and
> delivered? Seems oa little dd that offuh is not listed as a dependency
> in sax/prj/build.lst, but it is listed as a dependency of cppuhelper and
> cppuhelper is listed as a dependency
On 24 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> Ciao Rigo
>
>> > /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
>> > ELF header
>> >
>
> Now it stopped at expat, but the issue was the same: libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
> ELF header
>
>> > I'm wondering why there is a copy of
Ciao Rigo
> > /source/openoffice/main/solver/418/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: invalid
> > ELF header
> >
Now it stopped at expat, but the issue was the same: libgcc_s.so.1: invalid ELF
header
> > I'm wondering why there is a copy of libgcc_s.so.1 here. That should be
> > a system
Hello All,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:13:49PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Aug, Pedro Lino wrote:
> > Hi Don
> >
> >> Hmn, I don't know about the extras failure, but all of the other errors
> >> are failures to build various third party packages that we bundle. This
> >> should be
28 matches
Mail list logo
