Re: Status: 4.1.4

> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the > release manager :) > [...] > Comments? Feedback? I am ready for the translation of the release notes into German. We should remember to take care in time to the organization (creation

Re: Status: 4.1.4

> On May 25, 2017, at 3:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the >> release manager :) > > OK, perfect! > >> As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the >> latest.

Re: Status: 4.1.4

That was the link I was looking for! ;-) Will try the ones from 4.1.2 in my next build. Regards, Matthias Am 25.05.2017 um 08:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote: >> As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options, >> but they work (for me).

Re: Status: 4.1.4

On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote: I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the release manager :) OK, perfect! As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the latest. I don't think next week is realistic, since the process takes longer. Still, if the idea is

Re: Status: 4.1.4

On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote: As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options, but they work (for me). Release options are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/build-scripts/ The ones from 4.1.2 are correct, the ones from 4.1.3 are not (so

Re: Status: 4.1.4

Good to know... Time to update the Release Schedule on cWiki? ;-) Regards, Matthias Am 24.05.2017 um 20:37 schrieb Marcus: > Am 24.05.2017 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the >> release manager :) > > yes, you are. There was no vote or

Re: Status: 4.1.4

Am 24.05.2017 um 14:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski: I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the release manager :) yes, you are. There was no vote or other formal process. Just a proposal and nobody objected. So, sometimes it comes fast and easy. :-) Marcus As such, I think we

Re: Status: 4.1.4

Awesome! Am 24. Mai 2017 14:06:17 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski : >I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the >release manager :) > >As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the >latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for >4.1.4.

Re: Status: 4.1.4

Hi Raphael, SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Microsoft_SDKs/Windows/v7.0" ./configure \ --with-frame-home="$SDK_PATH" \ --with-psdk-home="$SDK_PATH" \ --with-midl-path="$SDK_PATH/bin" \ --with-ant-home="/cygdrive/c/apache-ant-1.9.9" \ --with-jdk-home="C:/PROGRA~1/Java/JDK17~1.0_8" \

Re: Status: 4.1.4

Hi Matthias Am .05.2017, 16:21 Uhr, schrieb Matthias Seidel : Hi Raphael, I did manage to build 4.1.4 (en-US, de, ja, pt) on Windows 7, although I am not sure if I use the correct configure. (Andrea did post a link some time ago, but I am not able to it...)

Re: Status: 4.1.4

Hi Raphael, I did manage to build 4.1.4 (en-US, de, ja, pt) on Windows 7, although I am not sure if I use the correct configure. (Andrea did post a link some time ago, but I am not able to it...) What is PSDK referring to? Matthias P.S.: I followed this guide:

Re: Status: 4.1.4

Hi All I have still a fight with the Windows SDK. For some reasons, PSDK is not recognized. Regards, Raphael Am .05.2017, 14:06 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski : I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the release manager :) As such, I think we should shoot for

Re: Status: 4.1.4

I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the release manager :) As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the latest. Last I checked, there were no remaining blockers for 4.1.4. As such, HEAD of http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO414/ represents what

Re: Status: 4.1.4

Hi Jim Am .05.2017, 15:53 Uhr, schrieb Jim Jagielski : I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4 release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't want to subject

Status: 4.1.4

I am going thru the proposed blockers in anticipation of a AOO 4.1.4 release. I have not approved the 2 graphics-related mods, simply because even though they look like they might be easy, I don't want to subject ourselves to the risk, even as small as it might be. Plus, good PR for 4.2.0.