On 11/3/13 8:29 PM, janI wrote:
On 3 November 2013 19:23, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote:
The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan
output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other
comments.
But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build system
to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ?
rgds
jan I.
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other
comments.
But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build system
to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ?
I think that I have added the ext_libraries
On 04.11.2013 15:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
[...]
But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build
system
to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ?
I think that I have added the ext_libraries/ratscan/ module. It is
built
On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other
comments.
But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build
system
to do ratscan, or is the ratscan
On 04.11.2013 15:41, Herbert Duerr wrote:
On 04.11.2013 15:30, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
[...]
But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build
system
to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ?
I think that I have added
On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other
comments.
But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build
system
On Nov 4, 2013 4:41 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other
comments
On 04.11.2013 16:53, janI wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013 4:41 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all
On 11/4/13 4:53 PM, janI wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013 4:41 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/4/13 3:46 PM, janI wrote:
On Nov 4, 2013 3:31 PM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
On 04.11.2013 10:36, janI wrote:
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all
, janI wrote:
Hi
I agree to using ratscan on trunk is a good idea, and all the other
comments.
But my original question is still not answered, do we use the build
system
to do ratscan, or is the ratscan target an old relict ?
I think that I have added the ext_libraries/ratscan/ module
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 5:47 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 2 November 2013 23:03, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan.
On Nov 2, 2013, at 1
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote:
The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan
output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1
a release this is something that PMC members must check. This is
more important to get correct than
On 3 November 2013 19:23, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 01:47:54AM +0100, janI wrote:
The project must do ratscans actively. PMC members need the ratscan
output in order to review IP License compliance. When you +1
a release this is something
On 03.11.2013 20:29, janI wrote:
it sure looks like it, thx for correcting me.
[...]
Besides, build-bot openoffice-linux64-rat runs the target weekly:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
that runs on trunk, and not on the branches.
Yes, I noticed that too. So I committed
Hi.
As part of making a new central Makefile I found the target ratscan.
Do we actively use this target or is it a leftover from the move to ASF ?
rgds
jan I.
Hi Jan,
Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan.
On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote:
Hi.
As part of making a new central Makefile I found the target ratscan.
Do we actively use this target or is it a leftover from the move to ASF ?
The project must do ratscans actively. PMC
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan.
On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote:
Hi.
As part of making a new central Makefile I found the target ratscan.
Do we actively use this target
On 2 November 2013 23:03, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for asking about Apache Rat and ratscan.
On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:54 PM, janI wrote:
Hi.
As part of making a new central
19 matches
Mail list logo
