On 11/07/2015 01:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Ok. Yeah, I remarked about the date in the attachments, so I will
>> change to Oct 28.
>
> The issue is not much the date value, but the date format. I've now
> fixed the script to produce exactly the same format we have in
>
Kay Schenk wrote:
Ok. Yeah, I remarked about the date in the attachments, so I will
change to Oct 28.
The issue is not much the date value, but the date format. I've now
fixed the script to produce exactly the same format we have in legacy
versions. At your option, you can re-run the script
Kay Schenk wrote:
On 11/05/2015 04:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
I just committed my few changes that I made to the devtools area.
As we have delayed these update feeds more than normal, unless there
is an objection, I will plan on committing them on Sunday, PST in
the am sometime.
1) 4.1.1 to
On 11/06/2015 03:34 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On 11/05/2015 04:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> I just committed my few changes that I made to the devtools area.
>> As we have delayed these update feeds more than normal, unless there
>> is an objection, I will plan on
On 11/05/2015 04:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 11/05/2015 03:48 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 05/11/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> I fixed up the localized download areas which is an input file to
>>> the script, so hopefully we're good on that now.
>>
>> Is it committed? I'd rather review
On 11/05/2015 03:48 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 05/11/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
>> I fixed up the localized download areas which is an input file to
>> the script, so hopefully we're good on that now.
>
> Is it committed? I'd rather review this update (which I don't see at
>
On 05/11/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
I fixed up the localized download areas which is an input file to
the script, so hopefully we're good on that now.
Is it committed? I'd rather review this update (which I don't see at
On 11/04/2015 09:30 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 11/04/2015 03:59 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> Ok, these are comments that already existed but I will change the
>>> spelling...
>>
>> Yes, all fixes are not due to some mistakes in your work, but to
>> previous stuff.
Kay Schenk wrote:
Ok, these are comments that already existed but I will change the
spelling...
Yes, all fixes are not due to some mistakes in your work, but to
previous stuff.
but the corresponding fixes still need to be done on the 4.1.0 -> 4.1.2
feed (and probably to the other two too)
On 11/04/2015 03:59 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Ok, these are comments that already existed but I will change the
>> spelling...
>
> Yes, all fixes are not due to some mistakes in your work, but to
> previous stuff.
>
>>> but the corresponding fixes still need to be done
On 11/01/2015 01:14 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2015 03:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/31/2015 10:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> see issue: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126612
>>>
Kay Schenk wrote:
The feeds for 4.0.0, 4.0.1, and 4.1.0 are now ready to be put in
place. I double checked the languages with what was actually
distributed for these versions, so hopefully all is well. But anyone
can take a look.
See attached in: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126612
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> The feeds for 4.0.0, 4.0.1, and 4.1.0 are now ready to be put in
>> place. I double checked the languages with what was actually
>> distributed for these versions, so hopefully all is well. But
On 10/31/2015 03:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 10/31/2015 10:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> see issue: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126612
>>> There's an update feed from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2 ready to go whenever
>>
Kay Schenk wrote:
see issue: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126612
There's an update feed from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2 ready to go whenever
we're ready for this.
Thanks! I think we are ready, +1 from me for putting it online when you
wish, like tomorrow or Monday. Just go ahead, the reason
On 10/31/2015 10:55 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>> see issue: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126612
>> There's an update feed from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2 ready to go whenever
>> we're ready for this.
>
> Thanks! I think we are ready, +1 from me
see issue: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126612
There's an update feed from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2 ready to go whenever
we're ready for this.
Commit the attachment to (viewvc version):
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/updates-site/trunk/aoo411/check.Update?view=log
I will work
17 matches
Mail list logo