Starting Introduction to Contributing to Apache OpenOffice Module

Hi there My name is Method Sibanda, I'm new to your program and my aim is to be able to create my own website and blog. I hope to learn much from you guys. Thank you Regards METHOD SIBANDA MAINTENANCE MANAGER COGHLAN WELSH & GUEST LEGAL PRACTITIONERS CECIL HOUSE NO_ 2 CENTRAL

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

By golly you are right, I didn't notice that mr. David Gerard has really turned this into a personal crusade of his. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > On 2015-09-15, 5:17 PM John D'Orazio wrote: > >> Well actually the case of the wikipedia article is

RE: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

Time, gentlemen, time. We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread go night-night. Whatever is thought of about what happens on Wikipedia, it is not ASF and AOO business. We have our own business to attend to. If folks want to keep fussing about it, there are

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

> On 16 Sep 15, at 13:56, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:52 PM, John D'Orazio > wrote: >> Interestingly mr. David Gerard IS a moderator on Wikipedia it seems. He >> still has to abide by the rules though. And there is quite

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

> On 16 Sep 15, at 15:38, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > Time, gentlemen, time. > > We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread go > night-night. > > Whatever is thought of about what happens on Wikipedia, it is not ASF and AOO > business.

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

According to the links on that page it's him. Am 16.09.2015 um 19:58 schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts: On 16 Sep 15, at 13:56, Rob Weir wrote: On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:52 PM, John D'Orazio wrote: Interestingly mr. David Gerard IS a

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:52 PM, John D'Orazio wrote: > Interestingly mr. David Gerard IS a moderator on Wikipedia it seems. He > still has to abide by the rules though. And there is quite a bit of > discussion on the talk page, where some users have opted to

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

> On 16 Sep 15, at 14:31, Max Merbald wrote: > > According to the links on that page it's him. Fantastic. One hopes he’s reading this. Louis PS in case others didn’t bother to follow up on Rob’s link, the title (self-appointed, I assume) held by Mr Gerard is enough to

Google Test now in gbuild and other good news

Hi I finally managed to win a long battle against GNU make and integrate Google Test into gbuild :-). Also updated the documentation on https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Googletest. Currently only main/sfx2 uses it, but I plan on migrating the other gbuild+cppunit modules. It's very platform

Re: Slow but steady, please

Hi, > On 14 Sep 15, at 20:13, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > > Hi Bruce; > > I just looked a bit ... > Calligra does look nice and I see it has advanced quite nicely. > > There's probably still the issue of multi-platform support but it > is certainly refreshing to see something

Re: Google Test now in gbuild and other good news

Am 09/16/2015 09:53 PM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: I finally managed to win a long battle against GNU make and integrate Google Test into gbuild :-). Also updated the documentation on https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Googletest. Currently only main/sfx2 uses it, but I plan on migrating the other

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Time, gentlemen, time. > > We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread go > night-night. > > Whatever is thought of about what happens on Wikipedia, it is not ASF and AOO > business.

Re: Google Test now in gbuild and other good news

Hi Damjian, > On 16 Sep 15, at 15:53, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > I finally managed to win a long battle against GNU make and integrate > Google Test into gbuild :-). Also updated the documentation on > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Googletest. Currently only

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

> On 16 Sep 15, at 17:27, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton >> wrote: >>> Time, gentlemen, time. >>> >>> We're far across the ad hominem boundary

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> Time, gentlemen, time. >> >> We're far across the ad hominem boundary and it is time to let this thread >> go night-night. >> >> Whatever is

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

On 09/16/2015 02:32 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 16 Sep 15, at 17:27, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton >>> wrote: Time,