> From: Pedro [mailto:pedro.l...@openmailbox.org]
> Even if you can increase the number of sheets, the most important
> question is: does ODF support this?
I would have to check, but I do not violate the LO / TDF against the ODF
standard.
> Regarding how many sheets: why doesn't AOO let the
In case (a), the table number should be increased _in the short term_,
for example to 1024. (more is better, but 1024 would already be a good
value for now)
Even if you can increase the number of sheets, the most important
question is: does ODF support this?
Regarding how many sheets: why
Hi
As of r1782030, AOO is successfully building with Clang 3.8 on Ubuntu 16.04
on x86 :-).
Other architectures might work - I did add changes for all of them, but
main/bridges uses dodgy low level C++ ABI hacks that (recent?) Clang
doesn't like. If so, please report back with the Clang version
On 7 Feb, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi Damjan;
>
> Looking at the log I was wondering what exactly clang 1.8 was and
> I took the liberty of fixing the mismatch ;).
>
> FWIW, AOO should now work fine with clang 3.9.1. Clang 4 reveals
> allocation issues.
Clang 4 on x86_64 uses a MOVAPS SSE
Hi Damjan;
Looking at the log I was wondering what exactly clang 1.8 was and
I took the liberty of fixing the mismatch ;).
FWIW, AOO should now work fine with clang 3.9.1. Clang 4 reveals
allocation issues. If someone is wondering why we/you should be using
clang, note that the FreeBSD buildbot
Am 27.01.2017 um 22:22 schrieb Marcus:
This post with patches doesn't got a reply until now. So, please can a
developer have a look?
Thanks a lot
@Patricia, Damjan, Ariel:
Please can you have a look? It's not often that we get problem reports
with attached patches to solve this. So, we
