On 18/12/2014 jan i wrote:
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, RA Stehmann wrote:
Hello,
we, Mechtilde and me, hope to see you at FOSDEM 2015.
I will be there, with apache stickers and a big smile.
Great, and do we need pins too? See
http://www.openoffice.org/marketing/art/galleries/logos/index.
On the user mailing list I posted the following on 12/09/2014:
Andrea,
You might want to take a closer look at your servers - certs are good but:
"This server is vulnerable to the OpenSSL CCS vulnerability
(CVE-2014-0224) and exploitable. Grade set to F."
"https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/a
On 12/18/2014 03:47 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>
> -- replying to --
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 14:36
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] "No Suitable JRE" Message
>
> Am 12/18/2014 03:01 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Ha
On 12/18/2014 02:22 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Michal Hriň wrote:
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
> My main concern at this point is the availability of security updates
> for this environment. I will be following up on a different thread
> about
> this. .
-- replying to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 14:36
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] "No Suitable JRE" Message
Am 12/18/2014 03:01 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
> "Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE).
>
Am 12/18/2014 11:24 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 12/18/2014 09:34 PM, schrieb Arthur Gilman:
In downloading only step one came up and after clicking on that, No
step 2
- Nothing!
Please explain in more details what you have down and where and what was
expected. At the moment I don't know what you me
Am 12/18/2014 03:01 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
"Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE).
A suitable JRE is unavailable. For details
http://openoffice.org/java.html";
I am proposing this to avoid the various cases that arise, not just the 32-bit
on x64 Windows cas
Am 12/18/2014 08:30 AM, schrieb shawphil...@aol.com:
I do not understand your reply.
OK, in more words:
Attachments are not allowed on this mailing list. Therefore the server
is stripping them off. So, your included error message is not visible.
As you have no problem with the download but
Am 12/18/2014 09:34 PM, schrieb Arthur Gilman:
In downloading only step one came up and after clicking on that, No step 2
- Nothing!
Please explain in more details what you have down and where and what was
expected. At the moment I don't know what you mean.
Thanks
Marcus
-
Michal Hriň wrote:
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
My main concern at this point is the availability of security updates
for this environment. I will be following up on a different thread about
this. ...
http://wiki.centos.org/Download
No need for a different thread, Michal'
In downloading only step one came up and after clicking on that, No step 2
- Nothing!
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we, Mechtilde and me, hope to see you at FOSDEM 2015.
I will be there, with apache stickers and a big smile.
rgds
jan i
>
> Kind regards
> Michael
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Your stand proposal for Apache Op
Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:46 Michal Hriň napísal(a):
Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:20 jan i napísal(a):
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti >
wrote:
Kay Schenk wrote:
I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver
Dňa 18.12.2014 o 20:20 jan i napísal(a):
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti >
wrote:
Kay Schenk wrote:
I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver
5?
It is our baseline (our reference platfor
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti >
> wrote:
> >
> > Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> >> I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver
> 5?
> >>
> >
> > It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
>
> Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver 5?
>>
>
> It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part of our
> commitment to users. The baseline can change (we did it for Mac),
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2014 05:46 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2014 06:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/11/2014 12:37 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 12/11/2014 04:58 PM, schrieb
On 12/17/2014 09:01 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
"Some OpenOffice operations use Java Runtime (JRE).
A suitable JRE is unavailable. For details
http://openoffice.org/java.html";
I am proposing this to avoid the various cases that arise, not just the 32-bit
on x64 Windows case.
On 12/14/2014 05:46 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 12/12/2014 06:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 12/11/2014 12:37 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 12/11/2014 04:58 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
+1 to Andreas. Sounds like a plan.
There seems to be some di
Kay Schenk wrote:
I would really like to know at some point why we're so tethered to ver 5?
It is our baseline (our reference platform). So it is part of our
commitment to users. The baseline can change (we did it for Mac), but if
there are no strong technical reasons for doing it is should r
Marcus
I do not understand your reply.
Philip Shaw
Sent from my iPad
> On 17 Dec 2014, at 20:09, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 12/17/2014 09:08 AM, schrieb Phil Shaw:
>> Dear Sirs
>>
>> I have been unable to install the download 4.1.1 version of Open
> > Office. Below is screen dump which includes t
21 matches
Mail list logo
