2015-05-19 10:15 GMT+02:00 Giuseppe Castagno :
> Ciao Roberto,
>
> On 05/18/2015 11:03 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
>
>> Ciao Giuseppe,
>>
>> if you can drop a description of what you're looking for on SourceForge
>> help wanted forum I can promote it.
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/helpwante
On 19/05/2015 10:20, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> So in ISO 639-X the most accurate you can pinpoint it is xo and then xho.
> And in glotolog; you have mpon1252 as its most precise denominator.
>
> Now as it *happens* - this language is spoken in an area fully covered by a
> single country -
Hi All,
Back in May 2014, I submitted a patch fixing this issue. I understand that
we have to be careful implementing it, due to the location of the bug.
We have had no responses from the 13 users CC'd to the list within a year.
The patch and details can be found here
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/
> On 19 May 2015, at 11:52, toki wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19/05/2015 08:05, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
>>> In testing out various grammar and spell checkers, I've come across a
>>> couple of instances, where different languages/dialects share the same
>>> ISO-639-# code.
>>
>> Can you give an e
On 19/05/2015 08:05, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>> In testing out various grammar and spell checkers, I've come across a
>> couple of instances, where different languages/dialects share the sam
e
>> ISO-639-# code.
>
> Can you give an example
ISO 639-1 is xo
ISO 639-2 is xho
ISO 639-3 is xho
Please for me away
2015-05-18 16:07 GMT+07:00 Nguyen Dinh Van :
> Hi you
>
> Are you sure, you have changed into folder instsetoo_native before running
> build --all ?
> ==> yes, I have.
> Which source do you try to build and from where do you download the source?
> ==> I did download source in t
Ciao Roberto,
On 05/18/2015 11:03 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Ciao Giuseppe,
if you can drop a description of what you're looking for on SourceForge
help wanted forum I can promote it.
http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/helpwanted/
Not sure I caught you right, anyway what I need:
knowledge of
> In testing out various grammar and spell checkers, I've come across a
> couple of instances, where different languages/dialects share the same
> ISO-639-# code.
Can you give an example - to understand this better ? Or do you mean collective
-1 (e.g. zh) or -2 codes (e.g. chi or zho) v.s. -3 ma
