I saw this on dev@ a.o and have not read later things here. Forgive me if
there are other recommendations. I trust any solution Kay comes up with.
My suggestion:
Copy 4.1.0 to a 4.1.2 branch. Staunch the problems of difficulty synchronizing
source to distributions and also allow a way to mak
Taravellier Remi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would you be kind to create a personal account for me.
> My Username would be: TITANIUM.
>
> In advance, thank you.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Quote: Logging in is required to edit pages.
> If you want to edit pages on this wiki, send an e-mail to the develop
Hello,
Would you be kind to create a personal account for me.
My Username would be: TITANIUM.
In advance, thank you.
Best regards.
Quote: Logging in is required to edit pages.
If you want to edit pages on this wiki, send an e-mail to the development
mailing list (no need to subscribe to th
Hello!
I was on Freenode IRC in the LibreOffice channels suggesting them to
implement an ODT property for the Portuguese dictionaries in order to
accept pre- and post- reform, so that later, when it becomes official,
AOO would have to implement it as well.
They told me that it depends on the
On Thursday, July 9, 2015, jan i > wrote:
> Heh
>
> you noted it yourself, wrong list.
>
> In my opinion we should change branch, I dont like reusing 410 because if
> we want to make a 4101 (security issues) it will be close
> to impossible.
>
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
> On 9 July 2015 at 21:47, Kay Sch
Hello,
My name is Mark Officer and my background is in software product
management/marketing and as such I would like to get involved in
OpenOffice in these areas. I live in New Hampshire, US.
Thank you,
Mark
-
To unsubscrib
Heh
you noted it yourself, wrong list.
In my opinion we should change branch, I dont like reusing 410 because if
we want to make a 4101 (security issues) it will be close
to impossible.
rgds
jan i.
On 9 July 2015 at 21:47, Kay Schenk wrote:
> It seems we are still using the 410 branch for th
It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. There
have been quite a number of changes to trunk since the 4.1.1 release
that I feel ALL these should be incorporated into 4.1.2.
How do we get the changes from trunk into the 410 branch easily?
It seems we could use --
svn copy
On 07/09/2015 01:34 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I use the thread to ask if there any links to the actual development
> builds.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-fullsets
>
>
> still refers to AOO 4.1.1 bui
please download the Base book from the documentation on the wiki, there are
also commercial books that talk about base, both as users
and programmatically.
http://www.openoffice.org/documentation/manuals/userguide3/0108GS3-GettingStartedWithBase.pdf
Showmedo has a great series of videotutorials abo
Gentlemen,
I will be relearning OpenOffice 'Base' starting in the near future. I
first learned it at the end of 2007. It is superb code. I will only be
using 'Ubuntu' as our operating system. I will only be working with
HP. They have the right stuff. Harvard is plugged in. So is everyone
else.
In
> On 9 Jul 2015, at 9:26 am, Regina Henschel wrote:
>
> JZA schrieb:
>> Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO?
>>
>
> Yes there are problems. You can look why it fails on
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/9
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/build
Hello!
I use the thread to ask if there any links to the actual development builds.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-fullsets
still refers to AOO 4.1.1 builds.
Thanks!
Mathias
---
JZA schrieb:
Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO?
Yes there are problems. You can look why it fails on
https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/9
https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/9
https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds/
14 matches
Mail list logo