Re: 2015-08-25 When Speaking as the Chair

2015-08-28 Thread toki
On 26/08/15 00:56, Tony Stevenson wrote: I don't want to have my communications to now be taken with more authority than they would were I not the Chair. For anyone who knows how the ASF works they will know that this is not even possible. As you are no more senior, and therefore carry

Re: 2015-08-25 When Speaking as the Chair

2015-08-28 Thread Roberto Galoppini
2015-08-28 15:38 GMT+02:00 toki toki.kant...@gmail.com: On 26/08/15 00:56, Tony Stevenson wrote: I don't want to have my communications to now be taken with more authority than they would were I not the Chair. For anyone who knows how the ASF works they will know that this is not even

Re: cppunit - Google Test migration and old failing tests

2015-08-28 Thread Pedro Giffuni
+1 Thank you for working on this. Having working unit tests is key for future development! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: cppunit - Google Test migration and old failing tests

2015-08-28 Thread Kay Schenk
On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to Google Test. However AOO doesn't build with cppunit and hasn't been routinely built with cppunit for a while, which means our unit tests are in a state of neglect, and

[REPORT] PMC 2015-07 Private-List Activity through July

2015-08-28 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
From an AOO PMC Member, I have compiled a high-level traffic analysis of discussion activity on the OpenOffice PMC private@ oo.a.o list. These are *statistics* and noisy ones at that. I am looking for trends that are good-enough at this level of precision. It is in the nature of private@

Re: Meta data changes for 4.1.2

2015-08-28 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote: The three patches for the basic part are probably easier to understand separately: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst?r1=1583558r2=1602195pathrev=1602195diff_format=h

Re: Meta data changes for 4.1.2

2015-08-28 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote: The three patches for the basic part are probably easier to understand separately:

RE: [REPORT] PMC 2015-07 Private-List Activity through July

2015-08-28 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
With a correction already, Of all the messages sent, 84.3% are by members of the PMC, 13.4% are by other ASF participants, and 2.3% are by others. [The extra decimals are simply to achieve a confirmable total of 100%, precision not so much.] -Original Message- From: Dennis

Re: [REPORT] PMC 2015-07 Private-List Activity through July

2015-08-28 Thread Phillip Rhodes
So what, if anything, should we take away from this? My (completely superficial, naive and uninformed) feeling is that that is a LOT of traffic on the private list. But maybe not. Anyway, is the idea here that there should be less traffic on that list? More? The same? I have to admit, I've

RE: [REPORT] PMC 2015-07 Private-List Activity through July

2015-08-28 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
I've heard that it is a whole lot and much more that the PMC policies warrant. I dug into this to find out exactly what a whole lot is and whether it is a way to demonstrate, without breaching confidentiality, when activity more aligned with the policy is reached over time. Thanks for your