Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

2015-09-17 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:25 AM, David Gerard wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir wrote: > >> Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a >> sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous >>

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

2015-09-17 Thread Phillip Rhodes
All of the above said, maybe we should drop this whole discussion, and let David have his way, and focus on getting a 4.1.2 release out the door. That should settle the issue, and shipping code is more important than Wikipedia anyway, right? So, what can I do to help with 4.1.2? Phil This

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

2015-09-17 Thread Phillip Rhodes
David, this has nothing to do with marketing, and I honestly feel like you are the one acting in bad faith here. This is about Wikipedia being accurate, and the simple truth is, on a question like "what's the status of AOO" none of your "sources" are more accurate than a primary source like the

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

2015-09-17 Thread David Gerard
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:27:53 GMT, Rob Weir wrote: > Last word, in case the inference is unclear. We're dealing with a > sophisticated serial infringer on Wikipedia. Correcting erroneous > information, which is proper to do, is unlikely to be achieved via an > edit war.

Re: Release Notes page for version 4.1.2 creates

2015-09-17 Thread Keith N. McKenna
On 9/12/2015 12:51 AM, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: > Hello Keith, > > On 12/09/2015 00:53, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> The Release Notes page for version 4.1.2 has been created and the >> template text added to it. The page is located at >>

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

2015-09-17 Thread toki
On 17/09/15 15:30, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > This is about Wikipedia being accurate, and the simple truth is, Wikipedia is not about accuracy, nor is it about truth. What it is about, is whether or not the delusions and hallucinations of the editors can be supported by an appeal to an external

Re: Wrongful information on the Wikipedia

2015-09-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Phillip Rhodes wrote: All of the above said, maybe we should drop this whole discussion Well, it remains the fact that "OpenOffice moribund" is false. The primary sources cited in the article (all of which are clearly misinterpreted) are: - A message from Juergen saying that he won't be

help how to create a patch

2015-09-17 Thread John D'Orazio
I believe I have found what can be considered a bug, or at least not intended behaviour, in the way the OpenOffice API takes values from Java when setting certain text properties (in this case "CharBackColor") using the XPropertySet interface. I have been discussing this on a forum thread (