RE: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

> -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 15:08 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 > > On 04/05/2016 01:36 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > Side question. > > > >>

[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

I think you will get more votes with more instructions. I've never done a gradle build, and have no idea how to do one. I'm sure I could find out, but that is going to take time. On 4/5/2016 4:07 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: This is for a source release of Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 from Apache

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

On 04/05/2016 01:36 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Side question. -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 04:07 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 This is for a source release of Groovy

Re: failed to build aoo420 dev on win32

For comparison, here is the debug version of my configure parameters: $ more run_configure.sh SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0" ./configure \ --enable-dbgutil \ --enable-symbols \ --disable-unit-tests \ --with-frame-home="$SDK_PATH" \

Re: failed to build aoo420 dev on win32

Hi Patricia > How are you specifying debug? Any differences between what you are doing and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1? I have been doing Windows 8.1 debug builds without any problems. I manually 'make debug=true' the

Re: failed to build aoo420 dev on win32

How are you specifying debug? Any differences between what you are doing and https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1? I have been doing Windows 8.1 debug builds without any problems. I manually 'make debug=true' the gmake

RE: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

+1 to the suggestions from Marcus > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 09:18 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues > > Am 04/05/2016 01:51 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >

[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

Side question. > -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 04:07 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 > > This is for a source release of Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 from Apache >

failed to build aoo420 dev on win32

Hi, i started to build a debug version, but had 4 build breaks till now. What surprises me is that i used same build environment to build aoo412 without trouble. any hints? Regards Oliver 1 Building module crashrep *possible* solution: press "Ignore" 2 Errors in module connectivity:

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Am 04/05/2016 01:51 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 4/4/2016 2:59 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 04/04/2016 11:30 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: ... In any case, since we don't currently have "official" distros for Solaris -- I would be content changing all these issues to ENHANCEMENT rather than DEFECT.

Re: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

+0 As you know I cannot really vote for the release because I haven't the knowledge for this. However, with this mail I want to express my positive approach for your work. Marcus Am 04/05/2016 01:07 PM, schrieb Carl Marcum: [...] So please VOTE on releasing RC1 (as defined above) as

[VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4

This is for a source release of Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4 from Apache OpenOffice and binaries made available from Maven via Apache Nexus. Source packages for RC1 are available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/devtools/ and the reference revision is r1737622. Binary Maven