Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

On 4/21/2016 3:12 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 04/21/2016 02:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/Users/Patricia/.groovy/grapes/org.openoffice/guno-extension/jars $ !find find . -type f -name

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

On 04/21/2016 02:09 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/Users/Patricia/.groovy/grapes/org.openoffice/guno-extension/jars $ !find find . -type f -name '*.class' -exec file '{}' ';' -print

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

The .class files in the uploaded .jar were compiled with Java 1.8: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/Users/Patricia/.groovy/grapes/org.openoffice/guno-extension/jars $ !find find . -type f -name '*.class' -exec file '{}' ';' -print ./org/openoffice/guno/SpreadsheetExtension.class: compiled

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

After some more testing: It works with JDK1.8 or JRE1.8, 32-bit or 64-bit in each case. However, it fails with the following output using jdk1.7.0_79. Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/OpenOfficeDev/GroovyUNO/test $ !gr groovy *.groovy Apr 21, 2016 10:03:31 AM

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

Like all sane Java-using programs, Groovy seems to be perfectly happy with a 64-bit JDK. In the shell I have been using for my UNO-testing: Patricia@Jan2014Desktop /cygdrive/c/OpenOfficeDev/GroovyUNO/test $ echo $JAVA_HOME C:/Program Files/Java/jdk1.8.0_71 which is a 64-bit release 8 JDK.

RE: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.4-RC2

I am having a different kind of difficulty. I think this experience is more for the Apache Groovy project, but some of it might apply to our prerequisites at . 1. I chose to use the Groovy 2.4.6 Windows Installer (.exe). 2. I do