Re: Donations?

I find this rather disturbing. Most non-profits to which I donate have some provision for designating a subgroup to benefit from the money. For example, if I write a check to "San Diego City College Foundation" and write "Robotics" in the memo field, it shows up as money the San Diego City

RE: Donations?

Apache OpenOffice does not receive donations and does not manage a budget. It happens there are some funds "on-account" at the ASF that are available to OpenOffice. Those arrived in an unusual manner in the early history of the project. That exception is unlikely to repeat. Generally, the

Re: Donations?

Unfortunately this community hasnt been very vocal about budgeting and is very lurky to know if we have any funds at all at the end of the day, we used to have very clear reports: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Community_Council/Funding_And_Budgets/Budget_2011 On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:55 PM,

Re: Donations?

Am 07/21/2016 09:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: In looking at the web pages to see where to insert mentoring offers etc., I noticed that https://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html has a link to "make a small donation". Does that collect any money, and if good question. But only the

Re: Donations?

What exactly will this bot do? On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > In looking at the web pages to see where to insert mentoring offers etc., > I noticed that https://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html has a link > to "make a small donation". Does that

Donations?

In looking at the web pages to see where to insert mentoring offers etc., I noticed that https://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html has a link to "make a small donation". Does that collect any money, and if so might it help with buildbot costs?

Re: Have 2.2, want to download 4.x

Am 07/21/2016 07:53 PM, schrieb tribalhorn: Thanks but...(I am an IT professional, have given training to developers) ah, OK. Not that common when we get these questions. Therefore my way of answer. ;-) > [...] do you know of any issues regarding files that are not > automatically removed

[REQUEST] Closing bugzilla issues

When issues are set to resolved it's possible to close them right away. So, they are not left in the RESOLVED state. Of course this doesn't fit for issues that are, e.g., fixed in the code but tests and verifications are still needed. But when an issue is not an AOO issue or not reproducible

Re: Re: Have 2.2, want to download 4.x

Thanks but...(I am an IT professional, have given training to developers)there is/was an issue with windows (many versions) where all files were not removed simply by uninstalling, depending on how the developers of the program designed/coded the program.Then you had to know exactly which files

Re: Have 2.2, want to download 4.x

Am 07/21/2016 07:11 PM, schrieb tribalhorn: I have version 2.2, but want to download/install the newest version, 4.1.x or the most stable version. Do you have information on any issues or conflicts when 4.1.x is installed over 2.2? Or should I remove 2.2 before installing 4.1.x? I use Windows

Re: Have 2.2, want to download 4.x

Hi This is not a mailing list intended for end users, but to answer your question anyway, I have both 3.2 and 4.1.2 installed on Windows XP, so it should be possible. Damjan On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:11 PM, tribalhorn wrote: > I have version 2.2, but want to

Have 2.2, want to download 4.x

I have version 2.2, but want to download/install the newest version, 4.1.x or the most stable version. Do you have information on any issues or conflicts when 4.1.x is installed over 2.2? Or should I remove 2.2 before installing 4.1.x? I use Windows XP version 2002 sp3 .I can also use Windows

[REPORT] CVE-2016-1513 Security Advisory

[BCC AOO Users; BCC AOO PMC] Today, advisory CVE-2016-1513 has been published with regard to disclosure of a potentially-exploitable defect in crafted Impress documents. The advisory can be found at . There is no updated release at