RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > > Am 08/09/2016 11:12 PM, schrieb

[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source

[BCC PMC] The [VOTE] to release the Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 source code has passed. Tally +1 Ariel Constenla-Haile +1 Patricia Shanahan +1 Marcus Lange +1 Carl Marcum +1 Kay Schenk +1 Andrea Pescetti 6 +1 Approve, with description (all bindng) 0 0 Abstentions 0

Re: Ready to setup release build machines?

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Seeing the issue from a purely technical point of view (i.e., imagining > for a while that there is no cost associated and no Infra around), how far > are we from having an "Apache OpenOffice build farm" where we can

Re: Resurrecting the subsequent tests

On 08/09/2016 12:21 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi Now that the buildbots work, and we are planning to start with releases again, it would be nice to have a good set of tests to run against releases, and running them against nightly builds wouldn't hurt either. Our unit tests do run during the

Buildbot wishlist ... Fwd: [GitHub] The Apache Software Foundation has approved a third-party application that you use

Hello; This is interesting but I have no time to investigate it. There's also travis-ci which would be a nice-to-have alternative to the ASF buildbots and I think they also support MacOS X. Pedro. Forwarded Message Subject: [GitHub] The Apache Software Foundation has

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 8/9/2016 3:12 PM, Marcus wrote: ... we have a documented release process here [1]. Of course it's for a full release. But for a bugfix (or emergency) release it can be derived and then shortend. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release+Planning+Template That is the

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Am 08/09/2016 11:07 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/9/2016 8:52 AM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: On 08/08/2016 09:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 07/08/2016 Marcus wrote: Maybe we are not that

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 8/9/2016 2:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Patricia Shanahan wrote: How do we go about getting trained as release manager? By making a release, or two. If we only do two or three releases a year, we will only be able to train release managers are a rate of about two a year. Is that fast

Re: Planning for emergency releases

Patricia Shanahan wrote: How do we go about getting trained as release manager? By making a release, or two. Documenting the process in more detail? You can see the whole process documented everywhere (ASF pages and CWiki for the 4.1.2 release), but it's a matter of tooling at this stage

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

[top posting] I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips that simply says -- "Unzip this package to some folder of your choosing and

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 8/9/2016 8:52 AM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: On 08/08/2016 09:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 07/08/2016 Marcus wrote: Maybe we are not that far aways from each other. What I want to to avoid is

Re: Review of the 4.1.2-patch1 MacOSX.README.txt file

Am 08/08/2016 09:54 PM, schrieb William L. Anderson: Kay, I have attached a ".txt" file that incorporates the changes suggested. Two items are *not* included. thanks. This is very much appreciated. We will include your text into the Readme file soon. (1) There is a need to provide the md5

Re: expat upgrade patch needs testing

Kay Schenk wrote: On 08/09/2016 10:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Kay, me and a bunch of other people have access to ooo-extras and can give you upload access. I already have access. Sorry for the poor wording. I was addressing Don and I meant "Kay AND me and a bunch of other people have

buildbot wish ... Fwd: [GitHub] The Apache Software Foundation has approved a third-party application that you use

(Reposting from my @apache address so it gets through easier) Hello; This (running coverity from github) is interesting but I have no time to investigate. There's also travis-ci which would be a nice-to-have alternative to the ASF buildbots and I think they also support MacOS X. Pedro.

Re: expat upgrade patch needs testing

On 08/09/2016 10:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Don Lewis wrote: If you get through the build, that's a pretty good test. During the build saxparser uses expat to read the .xml files for all of the locales. The other thing that expat seems to get used for is the tree view

Re: expat upgrade patch needs testing

Don Lewis wrote: If you get through the build, that's a pretty good test. During the build saxparser uses expat to read the .xml files for all of the locales. The other thing that expat seems to get used for is the tree view of help topics. Help -> OpenOffice Help -> Contents Just

Ready to setup release build machines?

Seeing the issue from a purely technical point of view (i.e., imagining for a while that there is no cost associated and no Infra around), how far are we from having an "Apache OpenOffice build farm" where we can build releases? Note: this is not a buildbot. Buildbots are meant to check that

Re: expat upgrade patch needs testing

On 9 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 08/08/2016 03:22 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 8 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 08/07/2016 08:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 5 Aug, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote: > I just submitted a patch to upgrade the bundled expat to version 2.2.0: >

Re: Resurrecting the subsequent tests

On 08/09/2016 09:21 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > Now that the buildbots work, and we are planning to start with releases > again, it would be nice to have a good set of tests to run against > releases, and running them against nightly builds wouldn't hurt either. > > Our unit tests do

Resurrecting the subsequent tests

Hi Now that the buildbots work, and we are planning to start with releases again, it would be nice to have a good set of tests to run against releases, and running them against nightly builds wouldn't hurt either. Our unit tests do run during the build and pass, but they cover very little. Sady,

Re: expat upgrade patch needs testing

On 08/08/2016 03:22 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > On 8 Aug, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> >> On 08/07/2016 08:03 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 5 Aug, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote: I just submitted a patch to upgrade the bundled expat to version 2.2.0:

Re: Planning for emergency releases

On 08/08/2016 09:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>> On 07/08/2016 Marcus wrote: Maybe we are not that far aways from each other. What I want to to avoid is to provide hundreads of MBs for a

RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 21:26 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > >> On

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 08/05/2016 12:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]

Re: Building AOO for Windows 10

Hi Dany, Are you behind a corporate firewall? If you use the address in your web browser do you see the directory listings? Does the svn process work if you replace https with http? Thanks, Carl On 08/09/2016 05:28 AM, Kirsten S wrote: Hello Together, thanks or your help so far.

Re: Building AOO for Windows 10

Hello Together, thanks or your help so far. Unfortunately I wasn`t sucesfull in building it yet. The period in the link above posted by me was an accident. When I execute the svn co statement it seems like the process starts shortly but after round about 10 seconds it finishes without any