Is this approved or not approved as a release blocker???
I thought there was a fix for this.
It is essential that this is fixed for Mac users.
On 2016-10-04, 4:20 PM bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
Patricia Shanahan has denied 4.1.3_release_blocker:
Issue 126622: Base 4.1.2 does not
Please post only objections to calling a vote on 4.1.3 tomorrow. I will
treat silence as consent.
As far as I can tell, we are ready to go.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional
Hagar Delest schreef op 04-10-2016 22:04:
My fear is: if AOO exports in OOXML (as LibO does), what will happen
to ODF? Most users would just use OOXML since it would be compatible
with AOO and MS Office. It may lead to frustration because of the
glitches from the conversions. OTOH, it may
Hagar Delest schreef op 03-10-2016 22:57:
Even if it came from a previous format, the goal was to make a
documented format to allow compatibility with other applications. So
not designed from scratch, agreed, but changes made for
interoperability. That's how I understand the target of ODF.
I
I have done some basic testing for the following environments and
language versions:
Windows 7 en_GB
Windows 8.1 en_GB, fr
Windows 10 en_GB
Ubuntu 16.04 en_GB
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
Jörg Schmidt schreef op 03-10-2016 12:14:
From: Hagar Delest [mailto:hagar.del...@laposte.net]
I think that ODF was designed to be a fully open standard to
give the users back the property of their own data.
No, that's not correct.
ODF was written this it was compatible with the
Hagar Delest schreef op 03-10-2016 0:27:
In fact, I came to OOo in 2006 because I used to use MS Word to
compile data and one day a file got corrupted for an unknown reason. I
discovered that there was no way to recover the file because it was
proprietary. I think that at that time the .doc
Could people working on the bugzilla entries check the status and update
as appropriate?
Note that I did not include the Mac Tables and Queries issue,
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622, in the release notes
because I did not see enough confirmation that it is fixed. I have now
Patricia Shanahan has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 126622: Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Patricia Shanahan has denied 4.1.3_release_blocker:
Issue 126622: Base 4.1.2 does not open Tables and Queries in Mac OSX
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126622
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:17:49 -0700
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
>
> On 10/4/2016 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
> > Am 10/04/2016 09:44 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> >> I downloaded and installed
> >> Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when
> >> I first
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I have built and run from the zip. I have also decompressed and
extracted each of the tarballs, and used "diff -r" to confirm they are
each identical to the zip. I do plan to do the signature and hash checks
for each of the three files.
You may want to add your own
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Once built and tested, how does one upload? I'm assuming
the prepare-download-tree.sh in aoo-devtools??
All builds have already been uploaded by Ariel for this RC. No need to
upload anything else.
I did upload a full set of Linux-64 builds to
On 10/4/2016 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/04/2016 09:44 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I downloaded and installed
Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when
I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected
"colour" (English spelling).
I thought
Am 10/04/2016 09:44 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I downloaded and installed
Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when
I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected
"colour" (English spelling).
I thought perhaps it picked up my previous use of
Le 04/10/2016 à 06:50, Peter Kovacs a écrit :
ODF has a better trancperency then OOXML. But beeing open we need to embrace
and value both formats.
This is the key point for AOO now IMHO.
I think there is a point having import filters to give users a way to open the
files. Then the natural
Am 10/04/2016 06:39 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On some of my Windows builds, I get a failure, but doing a new "build
--all", without cleaning, works. That may be worth trying while you are
waiting for more expert advice.
I think there may be problems in whatever is supposed to be enforcing
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> wrote:
>
>
> IMO providing different builds for same arch will make it difficult to
> QA, so I will go on with the Linux 64-bit builds. If someone wants to
> build on CentOS 5 32 bit and upload the binaries, please
I downloaded and installed
Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when
I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected
"colour" (English spelling).
I thought perhaps it picked up my previous use of en-US from my profile,
but I got the same
Once built and tested, how does one upload? I'm assuming
the prepare-download-tree.sh in aoo-devtools??
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 10/4/2016 4:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 3, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.
Sorry for the delay: Building OSX as we speak.
A build the week-before-last had no regressions.
> On Sep 25, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there
> are binaries they can run. I can't start the
On some of my Windows builds, I get a failure, but doing a new "build
--all", without cleaning, works. That may be worth trying while you are
waiting for more expert advice.
I think there may be problems in whatever is supposed to be enforcing
dependency order, so that a module gets built too
Am 10/04/2016 10:04 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
@Andrea:
Can you please check the
"apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.sha256" file? It's in
binary mode and not useable for checksum comparsion.
It can be used if you download it.
sorry, no. That's the reason why I
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
>
> On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>>> Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
>>> for a release.
>>>
>>> A PMC member, to cast a
Marcus wrote:
@Andrea:
Can you please check the
"apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.sha256" file? It's in
binary mode and not useable for checksum comparsion.
It can be used if you download it. But I've now forced all checksum
files to be treated as text, which should allow you to
Testing the reference builds is indeed extremely important, and should
be most of the testing.
The significance of the builds from source is that a PMC member can only
cast a binding +1 vote if they have done one, and we need at least three
binding +1 votes to release. They also need to have
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
According to http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#heads-up,
infra needs to be notified in advance of releases of more than 1GB.
This used to be important to avoid flooding the mirrors. The mirrors
that had disk space issues are now in a separate list which
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> and a very little bit is my opinion also:
> MS is one of our "Platinum sponsors" and it is not a good style blindly to
> grumble about MS
>
>
Maybe, but sponsoring the ASF also shouldn't undermine contributors'
29 matches
Mail list logo