It's an artifact of editing the release notes page - I wanted to be able
to compare two slightly different approaches. At this point, the
"Alternative" should have been deleted, but I have not yet found out how
to do it, or maybe don't have the Confluence karma to do so.
It will be fixed befor
Hello,
What is the meaning of the two almost identical Wiki pages:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Alternative+AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
and:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
?
Gretings,
Jörg
--
On 2016-10-10, 12:03 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 9 October 2016 20:21:32 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Coming back to this discussion based on recent conversations on the
OpenOffice dev list: does the Symantec code signing apply to Windows
only, or is it relevant to Mac OS X (and Gatekeeper) too?
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 10, 2016, at 2:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
We have separate a service for the Apple app store (and another for the Google
app store).
Could you provide some info (or a pointer to info) regarding the App-store
service, how it works, how to request access, etc..
Note t
Tested on a couple of other machines and reinstall/repair worked OK.
Cleaned AOO off the original Win 7 Ult x64 machine (incl. profile) and
installed, now reinstall/repair works there also.
Must have been a local glitch. Sorry for the noise.
No problem. Unfortunately it is almost impossible to
On 10.10.2016 11:37, Pedro wrote:
> On 10-10-2016 07:57, Dave wrote:
>> It is no longer possible to reinstall/repair a 4.1.3 installation under
>> Window without uninstalling first.
>> Not a release blocker for 4.1.4 but definitely a fix worth considering.
>
> I can not confirm your observation und
FWIW,
I attended the code signing related talk at ApacheConEU 2014.
While it only applied to Windows, I think it is important to
sign binaries: AOO is a wide target for the wares sites and
it's a matter of fact they may add spyware.
I suspect the App Store won't be available to us since they
us
> On Oct 10, 2016, at 2:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 9 October 2016 20:21:32 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 10/09/2016 Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 9 September 2016 23:29:49 BST, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
> The infrastructure team has regained access to the OpenOffi
> On Oct 9, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> I would like to see the old communication. Was the dev mailinglist
>> involved?
>
> Oh, sure! You can search for digital signatures on the dev list
> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?dev@openoffice.apache.org (I
On 10-10-2016 07:57, Dave wrote:
It is no longer possible to reinstall/repair a 4.1.3 installation under
Window without uninstalling first.
Not a release blocker for 4.1.4 but definitely a fix worth considering.
I can not confirm your observation under Windows 7 Pro x64.
Which Windows version a
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 08:57:37 +0200
Dave wrote:
> It is no longer possible to reinstall/repair a 4.1.3 installation under
> Window without uninstalling first.
> Not a release blocker for 4.1.4 but definitely a fix worth considering.
>
> --
For information: no such problem with 4.1.43 on Xubuntu
11 matches
Mail list logo